There are things that need to be done. Enough time has passed how it has, even with progression of knowledge and visual displays of learning for believers on the rise, the gospel hasn’t necessarily shown a contextual further requirement or self-requisite upon itself beyond the now common practice, to push people for roles as prophets. Obviously, some church leaders are aware this ideology isn’t always fruitful as some people, especially new believers, may be over-confident and elated that they know it all so quickly and may swerve off the standard teachings of living a disciplined life and teach outside the lines. The verbiage and timeframes of church terms has changed from prophet, priest, saint, Levite, to member believer or various church titles such as Sr. or Jr. Pastor or Lead this or that.
It’s possible not using past terms more word for word more regularly ended up causing a hesitancy in the systematic way things are done. Plus it’s not really an easy grace to call you a prophet and you a saint but the differences are that one is more busy with work, not intellectually or speaking able different, just the prophet had something in them desiring a call, or a life event that gave them more time to reflect on and retain passages, especially more futuristic things than retirement and worldly success, such as the prophetic events occurring in our day and age as ones more interested in the return of Christ, all aspects that contribute to a further ability to talk and speak on such topics. Regardless, unless you want to apply for a position in the church, you don’t really get a defined knowing or title unless it’s internal with yourself and your faith. This way of ongoing assembly could push people to spend less time to further invest time and study and the taking upon of a call, rather than just be sufficient in the weekly this or that as reliable people who show up and return home the way things often are today.
The saint says I became a rocket scientist engineer, I knew I could do the work head down and focused, thankful for life and God along the way, but if attaining to being a prophet changes rewards from ‘receive a prophet receive a prophets reward,’ verse ‘receive a righteous person receive a righteous persons reward,’ and ‘blessed are you if persecuted for righteousness you’ll inherit the kingdom of heaven,’ verse ‘blessed are you when reviled and persecuted, rejoice for great is your reward as they persecuted the prophets before you.’ Not to mention we are to desire the greater spiritual gifts and prophecy is right on top. The scientist says, maybe I’d have stopped my education halfway through & got a job in the industry at a lower level and opened this call otherwise I thought was being satisfied enough through integrity and participation as was?
This variance from how it was preached and relayed to us in the past, a past that did include the questioning of prophet reemergence within people awareness may be thwarted by antichrist operation during the Abomination of Desolation, the transgression that makes desolate – as it says regarding the man of lawlessness, ‘he’s standing in the holy place where he ought not,’ meaning his association to the 4th trampling beast that tramples all kings and nations across the world at the time of the end, has some influence to stop some context and church syllabus options. Can’t do much about that, but this is no new concept in the bible, people have always taken calls and gone through the process of reasoning out their faith through testing and continual effort.
Side stepping the reality of the titles of the past, that real life human beings before us were designated as prophets who carried out an agenda for God’s will to progress various needs whether proactive or for God’s defense, does not better defend the entirety of the bible and the belief which is founded by the patriarchs and prophets of our history. If they cooperated together for a collection effort in Acts, if they were tasked to physically build up the temple in Jerusalem at various times, or proclaim conceptually that the foundation of Zion 'that at times was desolate or trampled upon with contrary practice' needs restoration, than this type of thought, which ties to prophetic questioning in our day and age on things that we can and or should do, is still contextually healthy. We must modernize objectives inspired from the past that are tied to the remaining words and objectives left in the New Testament, that is connected to the Old Testament’s forewarnings and visions about the time of the end (there are many verses we can point our fingers to still needing to be addressed) and thus have an ongoing operation that should be large enough to satisfy the vision spoken of that needs to be clear for people to follow and help others understand further on.
It’s possible not using past terms more word for word more regularly ended up causing a hesitancy in the systematic way things are done. Plus it’s not really an easy grace to call you a prophet and you a saint but the differences are that one is more busy with work, not intellectually or speaking able different, just the prophet had something in them desiring a call, or a life event that gave them more time to reflect on and retain passages, especially more futuristic things than retirement and worldly success, such as the prophetic events occurring in our day and age as ones more interested in the return of Christ, all aspects that contribute to a further ability to talk and speak on such topics. Regardless, unless you want to apply for a position in the church, you don’t really get a defined knowing or title unless it’s internal with yourself and your faith. This way of ongoing assembly could push people to spend less time to further invest time and study and the taking upon of a call, rather than just be sufficient in the weekly this or that as reliable people who show up and return home the way things often are today.
The saint says I became a rocket scientist engineer, I knew I could do the work head down and focused, thankful for life and God along the way, but if attaining to being a prophet changes rewards from ‘receive a prophet receive a prophets reward,’ verse ‘receive a righteous person receive a righteous persons reward,’ and ‘blessed are you if persecuted for righteousness you’ll inherit the kingdom of heaven,’ verse ‘blessed are you when reviled and persecuted, rejoice for great is your reward as they persecuted the prophets before you.’ Not to mention we are to desire the greater spiritual gifts and prophecy is right on top. The scientist says, maybe I’d have stopped my education halfway through & got a job in the industry at a lower level and opened this call otherwise I thought was being satisfied enough through integrity and participation as was?
This variance from how it was preached and relayed to us in the past, a past that did include the questioning of prophet reemergence within people awareness may be thwarted by antichrist operation during the Abomination of Desolation, the transgression that makes desolate – as it says regarding the man of lawlessness, ‘he’s standing in the holy place where he ought not,’ meaning his association to the 4th trampling beast that tramples all kings and nations across the world at the time of the end, has some influence to stop some context and church syllabus options. Can’t do much about that, but this is no new concept in the bible, people have always taken calls and gone through the process of reasoning out their faith through testing and continual effort.
Side stepping the reality of the titles of the past, that real life human beings before us were designated as prophets who carried out an agenda for God’s will to progress various needs whether proactive or for God’s defense, does not better defend the entirety of the bible and the belief which is founded by the patriarchs and prophets of our history. If they cooperated together for a collection effort in Acts, if they were tasked to physically build up the temple in Jerusalem at various times, or proclaim conceptually that the foundation of Zion 'that at times was desolate or trampled upon with contrary practice' needs restoration, than this type of thought, which ties to prophetic questioning in our day and age on things that we can and or should do, is still contextually healthy. We must modernize objectives inspired from the past that are tied to the remaining words and objectives left in the New Testament, that is connected to the Old Testament’s forewarnings and visions about the time of the end (there are many verses we can point our fingers to still needing to be addressed) and thus have an ongoing operation that should be large enough to satisfy the vision spoken of that needs to be clear for people to follow and help others understand further on.
A HEART ON THE MATTER TO DENY MONEY FOR SAKE OF FULFILLMENT (II)
Sure, there could be a system of power and money in the business practice world that thwarts Christians from making millions so to have not have the power to ‘buy and sell,’ as they please – but it’s not real clear, just look at medium income housing and spending with constant online purchase deliveries for kids and themselves, vacationing, there isn’t anything necessarily helping the verse that this would occur to us—thankfully! Saving excessively doesn’t really clear us either, to some degree it is a way to do your part to not be worldly immersed but what’s earned is your keep, so we need something more. We need to highlight the heart of the matter to fulfill the Revelation verses that basically say part of the modern spy captivity we are in, during that time unless you worship the images of Satan’s realm you are prevented from buying and selling. Participation must occur in sync with fulfilling the heart of the collection as we institute the Mark of the Beast from Revelations that says more or less, ‘Christians must not become a mind encompassed by money, they must show a denial element to free buying and selling.’
Hopefully we have expanded our definitions on various word usages in the bible such as Jerusalem from physical territory to being about his people. Also called, Zion, which means no territory but territory of the heart at the center of God’s people which is always identified by the original place in Israel. Jesus said weep weep over Jerusalem for it’s the place all the prophets are stoned. But in Revelations it says they will die where their Lord was slain, but doesn’t just say Jerusalem plainly, but rather slain on the streets in the great city that symbolically is called Sodom and Egypt.’ I may be jumping the gun but I consider virtual scenarios an option to avoid literal death, I also consider that Jerusalem can be built with a graphic temple interface as part of the prophetic theme. It says the city is only 70,000 people and Jerusalem is larger than that. So slain in a place that symbolically was termed as a site of Christian landmark during the prophecy test possibly.
It also says these two witnesses will be ‘conquered by the beast,’ meaning within the cycle of things we don’t just accept a physical martyr concept first, or you just get conquered as if no effort was put up to withstand it. The beast that everyone must worship, or they are restricted from buying or selling, has many facets to it. Money, power, appearance, leverage, self-images, all part of the accomplishments and allures of this world represent the beasts imprint on this world that it worships as the final decision of their lifestyle. The boast in the practice of money is a large aspect to the devouring beast. Just as Jerusalem is also a spiritual term for a people type, so raising money, in the form of a prophetic collection during a time period, is a way to be conquered and participate in the business world. I said participate, not compete in net earnings, but be placed within the world of billionaires, probably dwarfed by many companies but still fulfilling a task at hand at a large enough scale, showing the Christian ability and aptitude isn’t lacking compared to the success of the non-religious as a reasoning factor to dismiss faith. See church isn’t just using religion to raise tithe donations for massive fundraising, it also is doing a best business practice in its final vision that is a large source of income anywhere to anyone.
Hopefully we have expanded our definitions on various word usages in the bible such as Jerusalem from physical territory to being about his people. Also called, Zion, which means no territory but territory of the heart at the center of God’s people which is always identified by the original place in Israel. Jesus said weep weep over Jerusalem for it’s the place all the prophets are stoned. But in Revelations it says they will die where their Lord was slain, but doesn’t just say Jerusalem plainly, but rather slain on the streets in the great city that symbolically is called Sodom and Egypt.’ I may be jumping the gun but I consider virtual scenarios an option to avoid literal death, I also consider that Jerusalem can be built with a graphic temple interface as part of the prophetic theme. It says the city is only 70,000 people and Jerusalem is larger than that. So slain in a place that symbolically was termed as a site of Christian landmark during the prophecy test possibly.
It also says these two witnesses will be ‘conquered by the beast,’ meaning within the cycle of things we don’t just accept a physical martyr concept first, or you just get conquered as if no effort was put up to withstand it. The beast that everyone must worship, or they are restricted from buying or selling, has many facets to it. Money, power, appearance, leverage, self-images, all part of the accomplishments and allures of this world represent the beasts imprint on this world that it worships as the final decision of their lifestyle. The boast in the practice of money is a large aspect to the devouring beast. Just as Jerusalem is also a spiritual term for a people type, so raising money, in the form of a prophetic collection during a time period, is a way to be conquered and participate in the business world. I said participate, not compete in net earnings, but be placed within the world of billionaires, probably dwarfed by many companies but still fulfilling a task at hand at a large enough scale, showing the Christian ability and aptitude isn’t lacking compared to the success of the non-religious as a reasoning factor to dismiss faith. See church isn’t just using religion to raise tithe donations for massive fundraising, it also is doing a best business practice in its final vision that is a large source of income anywhere to anyone.
MATTHEW LEVI (III)
Is it absurd to create a proposition, in an age with prevalent funding by businesses of all sorts, with many sustained and well-off independent churches funding themselves successfully as is, for FTE to have any expectance on a prophetic collection to be created via a business proposal to fulfill an end time vision? I suppose it would be slightly absurd to expect the high majority of churches to participate in something that brings up passage base scrutiny, not to mention creates claims of entitlement to do so in the first place. Some people become born again with tears after hitting a point when they actualized God is real and they’re future forward identity is now going to honor and trust in everything entailed. Some are born on a path of believing and don’t shake off their path from the get-go. The writer of this, just knew he was called, with tears, for a 100-fold fruit produce effort for the greatest number of believer change as the goal and to preach the end and to have max zeal with it all. It wasn’t until passages were further contemplated together that I figured I could go a step further of verification on why to see this through regarding this Matthew Levi absurd claim. At the end of 2016 I remembered the timeframe of the 70 year time period up to 80 years or so, that had to be addressed, or basically all things were lost regarding prophetic cycle interpretations (unless I see it in someone else completing it otherwise) that I always had read passages on in that manner, and the vision about the end of days out of Daniel would otherwise be a vague analysis or reading of other published books that could play a joint part in fulfillment, but still not as exact as what Daniel indicates at the end of the chapters. Regarding the vision, ‘The wicked won’t pay attention, but the righteous will make many understand and believe.’
If you read Part 2 Elijah Initiative Prophecy Document, the intention was to show a modern call can be a called out from the graves or tombs of the past through, as Peter called it, ‘the prophetic word.’ People didn’t grasp Jesus saying John was Elijah’s return, John just knew he was cousin to the savior and it was written about him in Isaiah as an affirmation to his call ‘the one crying in the wilderness make straight the path of the Lord.’ The primary purpose of the Part 2 writing was to show the interpretation is modern and something that helps us to see how to see the end vision according to the call and responsibilities that need to be carried out by a modern-day prophet call.
The prophets of the past lived not only to serve in their time, but for us in our day, they understood time spent in the future was not only their form of additional optimism, but protection against movements of organized mob tendencies that would develop and otherwise stop final preaching. In 1 Peter 1:12 it is written ‘It was revealed to them that they were serving not themselves but you, in the things that have now been announced to you through those who preached the good news to you by the Holy Spirit sent from heaven, things into which angels long to look.’ Followed by 2 Peter 2:19 ‘And we have the prophetic word more fully confirmed to which you will do well to pay attention to..’ It’s part of the scenario, to figure out what we need to cipher as Holy Spirit lead missions to complete in our day and age.
Paul got his call by being blinded for 3 days and hearing the voice of the Lord directly, his partner Timothy had a further divine call because of ‘prophecies previously made about him,’ that strengthened through the laying of hands done on him and the strong faith of his grandmother and mother. 1 Timothy 1:18 ‘This charge I entrust to you, Timothy, my child, in accordance with the prophecies previously made about you, that by them you may wage the good warfare.’ The 11-12 disciples had an additional call working with Lord directly, Paul had direct revelation, Timothy had prophecies that became manifested into the word if not previously written, all people with chosen calls to do. Part of Timothy’s job was to be entrusted with the deposit and handle matters of the collection when Paul was off to who knows where. 1 Timothy 6:20 ‘O Timothy, guard the deposit entrusted to you..’ This helps give some faith, that in today’s time, a call from the past could be accepted in the future in prophetic fashion by whoever it is for the job, called by God to do so.
This brings us to a few particular verses that I always comprehended were unsolved but hadn’t put things together in the Matthew Levi callout way. At the end of the book of John, it talks about a disciple who may not die and return at the end of the age. That means an open prophecy could be contemplated here in this age. They are referring to the ‘beloved,’ disciple. Yes, all 12 (12 as Mathias) were beloved too, but the text needed to point out ‘beloved,’ for extra attention to be brought to this one person. This is the same disciple who loyally asked Jesus regarding who would be Judas at the last supper before his betrayed death, ‘who will betray you?’ not to mention the one faster running to the tomb than Peter separately referenced. This disciple obviously was a loyal close friend of Jesus to be called ‘the one whom I loved.’ The verse at the end of John 21 talks about this ‘beloved disciple,’ who may not die and may be alive when I return. Verse 22 & 23 said to Peter asking of the disciple; “If it is my will that he remain until I come, what is that to you? You follow me!” so the saying spread abroad among the brothers that this disciple was not to die; yet Jesus did not say to him that he was not to die, but, “If it is my will that he remain until I come, what is that to you?”
He may not die? He will stay until Jesus returns as promised? That’d have to basically be an immortal 2,000 plus years being. Jesus said it how he needed to say it in his response that this disciple may or may not die, what is it to you. At the time, the other disciples didn’t actualize Jesus earlier telling them John the Baptist was the modern call of Elijah return. John the Baptist was in fact the return of Elijah to come, yet John the Baptist died as did Elijah years before as two separate people. Two separate people, each breathed and spoke in a different generation, yet part of prophecy lingo to make them intertwined in the word. It’s possible he could have ascended into heaven and not died, but it’s not the point. It’s not possible to live 2,000 plus years and be there during the return unless he descended with Christ which is unlikely – more likely he will return at the start of heaven day 1, his bones may be deteriorated I don’t know. We do know it initiates a call to the future.
Levites were the workers inside the church with the priests, they collected taxes, they kept ongoing activities in motion, skilled enough people as project manage workers, friends of singers, people set apart to learn more of what Levitical Priest means. To further understand the covenant of Levi read Malachi 2:4-7 but it’s an appointed role to become a priest and Levi and Levites are a heritage for God and his temple and altar. The first three books of the gospel bring out a question we must ask ourselves, why call Matthew, when first being called a disciple, Levi in two of the first three books?
If you read Part 2 Elijah Initiative Prophecy Document, the intention was to show a modern call can be a called out from the graves or tombs of the past through, as Peter called it, ‘the prophetic word.’ People didn’t grasp Jesus saying John was Elijah’s return, John just knew he was cousin to the savior and it was written about him in Isaiah as an affirmation to his call ‘the one crying in the wilderness make straight the path of the Lord.’ The primary purpose of the Part 2 writing was to show the interpretation is modern and something that helps us to see how to see the end vision according to the call and responsibilities that need to be carried out by a modern-day prophet call.
The prophets of the past lived not only to serve in their time, but for us in our day, they understood time spent in the future was not only their form of additional optimism, but protection against movements of organized mob tendencies that would develop and otherwise stop final preaching. In 1 Peter 1:12 it is written ‘It was revealed to them that they were serving not themselves but you, in the things that have now been announced to you through those who preached the good news to you by the Holy Spirit sent from heaven, things into which angels long to look.’ Followed by 2 Peter 2:19 ‘And we have the prophetic word more fully confirmed to which you will do well to pay attention to..’ It’s part of the scenario, to figure out what we need to cipher as Holy Spirit lead missions to complete in our day and age.
Paul got his call by being blinded for 3 days and hearing the voice of the Lord directly, his partner Timothy had a further divine call because of ‘prophecies previously made about him,’ that strengthened through the laying of hands done on him and the strong faith of his grandmother and mother. 1 Timothy 1:18 ‘This charge I entrust to you, Timothy, my child, in accordance with the prophecies previously made about you, that by them you may wage the good warfare.’ The 11-12 disciples had an additional call working with Lord directly, Paul had direct revelation, Timothy had prophecies that became manifested into the word if not previously written, all people with chosen calls to do. Part of Timothy’s job was to be entrusted with the deposit and handle matters of the collection when Paul was off to who knows where. 1 Timothy 6:20 ‘O Timothy, guard the deposit entrusted to you..’ This helps give some faith, that in today’s time, a call from the past could be accepted in the future in prophetic fashion by whoever it is for the job, called by God to do so.
This brings us to a few particular verses that I always comprehended were unsolved but hadn’t put things together in the Matthew Levi callout way. At the end of the book of John, it talks about a disciple who may not die and return at the end of the age. That means an open prophecy could be contemplated here in this age. They are referring to the ‘beloved,’ disciple. Yes, all 12 (12 as Mathias) were beloved too, but the text needed to point out ‘beloved,’ for extra attention to be brought to this one person. This is the same disciple who loyally asked Jesus regarding who would be Judas at the last supper before his betrayed death, ‘who will betray you?’ not to mention the one faster running to the tomb than Peter separately referenced. This disciple obviously was a loyal close friend of Jesus to be called ‘the one whom I loved.’ The verse at the end of John 21 talks about this ‘beloved disciple,’ who may not die and may be alive when I return. Verse 22 & 23 said to Peter asking of the disciple; “If it is my will that he remain until I come, what is that to you? You follow me!” so the saying spread abroad among the brothers that this disciple was not to die; yet Jesus did not say to him that he was not to die, but, “If it is my will that he remain until I come, what is that to you?”
He may not die? He will stay until Jesus returns as promised? That’d have to basically be an immortal 2,000 plus years being. Jesus said it how he needed to say it in his response that this disciple may or may not die, what is it to you. At the time, the other disciples didn’t actualize Jesus earlier telling them John the Baptist was the modern call of Elijah return. John the Baptist was in fact the return of Elijah to come, yet John the Baptist died as did Elijah years before as two separate people. Two separate people, each breathed and spoke in a different generation, yet part of prophecy lingo to make them intertwined in the word. It’s possible he could have ascended into heaven and not died, but it’s not the point. It’s not possible to live 2,000 plus years and be there during the return unless he descended with Christ which is unlikely – more likely he will return at the start of heaven day 1, his bones may be deteriorated I don’t know. We do know it initiates a call to the future.
Levites were the workers inside the church with the priests, they collected taxes, they kept ongoing activities in motion, skilled enough people as project manage workers, friends of singers, people set apart to learn more of what Levitical Priest means. To further understand the covenant of Levi read Malachi 2:4-7 but it’s an appointed role to become a priest and Levi and Levites are a heritage for God and his temple and altar. The first three books of the gospel bring out a question we must ask ourselves, why call Matthew, when first being called a disciple, Levi in two of the first three books?
MATTHEW MARK LUKE
As you see Matthew, also called Levi, was a tax collector. He probably got the nickname ‘Levi,’ because he collected taxes in Levitical fashion, maybe named through scoffing to the churches monetary money-making system, probably because he didn’t mind the name Levi and the duty of Levites and Levitical priests from Old Testament writings he may have learned some. I was confused for awhile with this, why switch names, are they two different people? That can’t be, the passages are about the same person. Maybe, since it’s now grasped further with the Elijah John analogy, a person named Matthew creates a banter to do a Levitical role of prophetic collection through the name Levi to say he is the capable person to press this into fruition? Regardless of who’s who in the modern era, the FTE current proposal will generate loads of taxes, bring together many people for ongoing initiatives that satisfy the vision of Daniel, and complement many writers of the past writing about the day of the Lord. So if the disciple whom Jesus loved, is to possibly remain until I come, what does that mean? He may or may not be one of the Revelation witnesses, because they die before he returns – but how could you as the analogy teacher remain if your dead prior? The duty is to see fulfillment done, direction and instruction is in the Old and New Testament – but the future is still playing out. Are you the witness? Could be!