|
Part 1: Why a prophecy? (intro)
Part 2: Elijah initiative prophecy document (15-35 minutes read time) Part 3: Matthew Levi prophecy test & mortal-wound-head formation (10-20 minutes) Part 4: Olive Tree Analogy Prophecy (10-15 minutes) |
Next Page |
Elijah Initiative
‘More than a historic past investigation, a call to the future now.’
The book of Malachi is the last book in the Old Testament. The last two verses of this last book prior to the New Testament talks about a past prophet Elijah who was no longer living on earth but may return: “Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the great and awesome day of the LORD comes.” How is that possible that Elijah would return if he was already dead or had ascended to heaven? Why write that? We know Elijah was referenced earlier in the Old Testament book of Chronicles (which was written decades before Malachi after he disappeared), so was it prophesied about someone rising from the grave into the future? Was he the designated messiah to come that was speculated about within Jewish belief groups? Well, regarding this; the Pharisees, the Sadducees, the Jews, even Jesus had to take time to explore and address this same prophetic concept. Jesus brought this up on several occasions by saying ‘to those with ears willing to hear, John the Baptist is Elijah,’ not to mention also explaining this concept further through himself, when implying he could be the son of David even if born centuries after him. What does this mean?
It means not everything in life is an exact literal interpretation or we close ourselves off to additional meanings and requirements. Sometimes we don’t understand slang, sometimes we don’t understand a joke or what the other person is trying to get through to you. The bible also requires we see the meaning behind the material, even if it challenges us to put together words and expressions to contextualize and generalize into instruction. Both phrases and words can have duel meanings, sometimes we have to dig deeper and not be complacent, especially given we are called to try harder than the people that were unwilling to learn parables. Some of the rhetoric within the bible requires additional effort, to see that belief is a free gift of better ongoing living and this additional component implies we are to value the meaning of life and acknowledge that God revealed enough things for us to balance the knowledge and lives we are living. There are more complex elements revealed to us, such as a predestination control element of God over us in our lives, a conversation that is often difficult for people to accept or biblically review but nothing is that simple is it? It’s not all easy, but when passages at times reference and use symbolic words, we are supposed to see and acknowledge different angles and paraphrases and see cycles.
While the prophetic word of the gospel is designated to be a useful tool for teaching, reproof, training in righteousness, and a source of historic reminder of mankind’s various states of progression control and development, we need to also acknowledge that requirements can always be alive into future prophecy objective tasks to carry out. John said, ‘I’m the one in the wilderness out to make straight the paths of the Lord,’ and it was written about me in Isaiah – here I’ll point to an exact verse that was about me before I was born. Jesus had to reference himself as the Christ as well at times, especially after he was resurrected when he ‘told them about all the scriptures written beforehand about himself.’ The living word of God needs to not just be a dead practice to this extra effort or call, or the scrutiny of this lack could hurt the integrity of the belief in this day and age after many years have passed with less urgency. Everything that is founded from this sacred ancient gospel, that has passed on influentially through the generations up to this point, requires an ongoing comprehension component. All material takes time to soak in, nothing is discerned unanimously immediately, and different styles take time and effort to learn - we are supposed to acknowledge everything within it. This includes the call of prophet still part of prophetic cycle, even out to this age as something we can’t dismiss (even if Revelations says no more words will ever be added to the book).
But this is all fulfilled and past gone behind us already right? If Elijah already came as a spiritual reincarnation example similar to John with John now a separate person become designated as the modern-day person excepting a further biblical role to carryout, this is surely fulfilled and irrelevant to us right? We know the role was designated to John the cousin of Jesus with some additional magnification. His dad, prior to Johns birth, spoke with an angel of the Lord during his pregnancy and was muted to even question this belief, that his son was to be a messenger for the Lord of Hosts (a large significant story to say and or happen that coincides with his predestined role); yet it’s merely but a nice past history story to us right? Not necessarily! The Elijah initiative may be a real tangible thing in the time before the end, yet again. Lets first look at some connecting verses, that don’t allow us to disbelieve this notion, that we will eventually connect to the Revelation prophets.
Instead of going back to Chronicles to go over the miracles of Elijah, lets jump up to the New Testament book of James that talks about one of the feats of Elijah. This is what it says, ‘The prayer of a righteous person has great power as it is working. Elijah was man with a nature like ours, and he prayed fervently that it might not rain, and for three years and six months it did not rain on the earth. Then he prayed again, and heaven gave rain, and the earth bore its fruit.’ This feat of Elijah is a task also referenced in Revelations to be initiated by two prophets. Sure Malachi fulfillment regarding this is already a satisfied requirement that has been met, both Jesus and John made it clear Elijah did return if you are willing to open the material up, but speculation today about this type of scenario needs to not be complacent with unspecific reference, resolve, or side-about explanations. It needs to be addressed as a real-life task with objectives to be done that will help to satisfy and ease the remaining voids left in this long standing book of the gospel in a far different era and time.
Some people have a tendency to sidestep direct initiative by utilizing or referencing enough information that results in nothing coming about further on matters outside their knowledge scope or comfort. Sometimes we use material that comes in our head to mute the additional dilemmas of would be scrutiny. Sure, the vision on the mountain with Elijah and Moses creates a roundabout impression that they could be the two Revelation witnesses so we don’t need to make this a modern objective anymore; this may have been the rationalization even only decades ago, or some may designate this fulfillment to have already occurred by pointing to the lead founders of the early church with Peter and Paul/Timothy being these two prophets of Revelations 11 – that fulfillment occurred all at the beginning and end of that time segment. Trust me, this has been speculated enough on even in recent years, I saw people miss verses on John the Baptist being Elijah (which Jesus directly said) and claim the vision on the mountain with Elijah and Moses was all they needed to reference regarding this to end the discussion. During this time of various religious research, I had spent countless hours reading internet comments and writings on people’s thoughts on various prophetic matters leading up to now. The connection we need to make, is that we have objectives to do before us! Revelations says, ‘And I will grant authority to my two witnesses, and they will prophesy for 1,260 days, clothed in sackcloth.’ It also says, ‘They have the power to shut the sky, that no rain may fall during the days of their prophesying.’ 1,260 days is the same duration as 3.5 years and the task of no rainfall helps affirm we need to see an exact game plan before us. The task of Elijah is part of the Revelation direction about the end of times. Don’t worry the designated areas of no rainfall are already severe drought areas in the desert! So can we confirm the Elijah initiative is a real thing to address in the year 2020? I sure hope we do!
This isn’t a matter to be dismissed by convenience or any form of pretension that seems louder otherwise. It’s a process systematically intertwined within the gospel. We also should remember we are dealing with the largest group associated practice in the history of existence (Religion: Christianity) that must be a solid and true practice, that relies on its connected ongoing soundness to be a proven component within the contextual belief that it stands for. The Elijah constituent within the material is and always has been meant to be active within the God ordained outline and agenda, which unfortunately hasn’t always been the case. We must strive to be better, as people earning their eternity, we shouldn’t restrict the material but be cautious and open with its various realities that doesn’t leave much out. Prior to this age when publishing was just getting started back in the bible days after Jesus’s death, literary development was behind the modern future mind during slow or changing times in existence; people often missed additional interpretations as they didn’t see updated translations and or missed many notions of gospel initiative altogether. We’ve made some errors up to this point with representing the practice, we cannot continue making it an art or craft to downplay things for the sake of preserving comfort in the now as though it’s the only best leadership. Your noble past effort to keep things conserved as is may not be warranted (even as a believer that knows to just defend pastors and churches in general as the starting and stopping point) doesn’t necessarily help to heal the cohesive value or better said function of the religion altogether.
Hopefully, even with some still a bit sour as will always be the case, we have progressed beyond bashing the church in this time before the end, in that all past accusations against the church can be diminished some, after enough modern time has passed, given the resolves and charities and good works the church has done these last decades is a loud good leading cause; not to mention, by doing something like a prophecy test it helps to show we follow through with a proper execution as something that should help to polish all things coming to completion – making it less of a historic example along the way, but a living practice caught up to speed from A to Z. Sometimes we keep control unnecessarily, we fight for worldly precepts errantly, we choose control and elementary teachings that don’t rely on faith or eternity but common decisions that best serve standard living conduct protection. This type of effort requires we really make it about a deeper meaning because things are going on just fine without this, people are busy making money and living, but the bible expects more calling out to the harvesters always telling us to be on edge awake and ready.
At times in our controversial past, we have tried to control life excessively, or make it the life goal to be restricted to an identical one image of what Christ in us is to be, and we’ve not been true with gauging living and time and production in our societies, failing on various passages that would have given us additional freedoms that would have made it easier on people; some of these tendencies can be attributed to past poor outlooks that didn’t factor enough on behalf of everyone, when social allowances (or deviances) throughout our history highlighted various forms of neglect from the church so to speak, where large majorities of practicing people in the church had low or no resolve, that could allow different harsh requirement outlooks and justifications failing to see God or humanity in others. Sex and modest parts are seen daily in relationships, caffeine creates a buzz, we get some sugar to eat as it pleasures the tongue, we get some wine to drink, but teaching things isn't always easy - especially given we can remember only a percentage of verses, ones that usually go with how we are earning rewards with our own good conduct. It would be better to be forgiven than bitter on this matter and remember that just as the covenant of Moses came to an end being deemed ‘obsolete,’ the new covenant of Christs spirit in us, that gives many defenses on living justified in faith and grace, is progressing to final expectation levels as exposure and maturation numbers help settle our impressions on various ways of conduct. The Revelations 11 Elijah operation stays within its boundaries in this regard, being a notable updated time needed objective that does not abolish current practice or statute, but reminds us of the eternal timeline and prophecy objectives before us.
This is a prophecy test that is open and good with much more than just Elijah tasks, that will help to skillfully resolve the zeal of church prerogative often questioned, that will defend the total practice and give information that helps to ease and surpass any overwhelmed feelings of this operation being a threat to human treatment or progress in general. This allotted timeframe we are now in, this purpose at hand intended for the time at hand before us, helps us to further reveal things appropriately one way or the other, as testing leads to further progress. Each resolve and scenario is delicately thought out to appease representation of the gospel in our lives, along with addressing the forewarnings we sometimes sidestep. A test can pass or fail, but you can’t skip it to find out. What does the New Testament say regarding this, ‘do not despise prophecies, but test everything; hold fast what is good.’ Christ returns in the prophecy test window and hallelujah its been a long time coming and people suffering will be thankful, it's a pass! If he fails to return in the window, then we established a prophecy and pass it virtually even if it's a fail on the better eternity to immediately come optimism that says a generation should not pass after Jerusalem was surrounded by armies and we witnessed its destruction as foretold (an event to occur that did, prior to end of first earth at the immediate end).
It means not everything in life is an exact literal interpretation or we close ourselves off to additional meanings and requirements. Sometimes we don’t understand slang, sometimes we don’t understand a joke or what the other person is trying to get through to you. The bible also requires we see the meaning behind the material, even if it challenges us to put together words and expressions to contextualize and generalize into instruction. Both phrases and words can have duel meanings, sometimes we have to dig deeper and not be complacent, especially given we are called to try harder than the people that were unwilling to learn parables. Some of the rhetoric within the bible requires additional effort, to see that belief is a free gift of better ongoing living and this additional component implies we are to value the meaning of life and acknowledge that God revealed enough things for us to balance the knowledge and lives we are living. There are more complex elements revealed to us, such as a predestination control element of God over us in our lives, a conversation that is often difficult for people to accept or biblically review but nothing is that simple is it? It’s not all easy, but when passages at times reference and use symbolic words, we are supposed to see and acknowledge different angles and paraphrases and see cycles.
While the prophetic word of the gospel is designated to be a useful tool for teaching, reproof, training in righteousness, and a source of historic reminder of mankind’s various states of progression control and development, we need to also acknowledge that requirements can always be alive into future prophecy objective tasks to carry out. John said, ‘I’m the one in the wilderness out to make straight the paths of the Lord,’ and it was written about me in Isaiah – here I’ll point to an exact verse that was about me before I was born. Jesus had to reference himself as the Christ as well at times, especially after he was resurrected when he ‘told them about all the scriptures written beforehand about himself.’ The living word of God needs to not just be a dead practice to this extra effort or call, or the scrutiny of this lack could hurt the integrity of the belief in this day and age after many years have passed with less urgency. Everything that is founded from this sacred ancient gospel, that has passed on influentially through the generations up to this point, requires an ongoing comprehension component. All material takes time to soak in, nothing is discerned unanimously immediately, and different styles take time and effort to learn - we are supposed to acknowledge everything within it. This includes the call of prophet still part of prophetic cycle, even out to this age as something we can’t dismiss (even if Revelations says no more words will ever be added to the book).
But this is all fulfilled and past gone behind us already right? If Elijah already came as a spiritual reincarnation example similar to John with John now a separate person become designated as the modern-day person excepting a further biblical role to carryout, this is surely fulfilled and irrelevant to us right? We know the role was designated to John the cousin of Jesus with some additional magnification. His dad, prior to Johns birth, spoke with an angel of the Lord during his pregnancy and was muted to even question this belief, that his son was to be a messenger for the Lord of Hosts (a large significant story to say and or happen that coincides with his predestined role); yet it’s merely but a nice past history story to us right? Not necessarily! The Elijah initiative may be a real tangible thing in the time before the end, yet again. Lets first look at some connecting verses, that don’t allow us to disbelieve this notion, that we will eventually connect to the Revelation prophets.
Instead of going back to Chronicles to go over the miracles of Elijah, lets jump up to the New Testament book of James that talks about one of the feats of Elijah. This is what it says, ‘The prayer of a righteous person has great power as it is working. Elijah was man with a nature like ours, and he prayed fervently that it might not rain, and for three years and six months it did not rain on the earth. Then he prayed again, and heaven gave rain, and the earth bore its fruit.’ This feat of Elijah is a task also referenced in Revelations to be initiated by two prophets. Sure Malachi fulfillment regarding this is already a satisfied requirement that has been met, both Jesus and John made it clear Elijah did return if you are willing to open the material up, but speculation today about this type of scenario needs to not be complacent with unspecific reference, resolve, or side-about explanations. It needs to be addressed as a real-life task with objectives to be done that will help to satisfy and ease the remaining voids left in this long standing book of the gospel in a far different era and time.
Some people have a tendency to sidestep direct initiative by utilizing or referencing enough information that results in nothing coming about further on matters outside their knowledge scope or comfort. Sometimes we use material that comes in our head to mute the additional dilemmas of would be scrutiny. Sure, the vision on the mountain with Elijah and Moses creates a roundabout impression that they could be the two Revelation witnesses so we don’t need to make this a modern objective anymore; this may have been the rationalization even only decades ago, or some may designate this fulfillment to have already occurred by pointing to the lead founders of the early church with Peter and Paul/Timothy being these two prophets of Revelations 11 – that fulfillment occurred all at the beginning and end of that time segment. Trust me, this has been speculated enough on even in recent years, I saw people miss verses on John the Baptist being Elijah (which Jesus directly said) and claim the vision on the mountain with Elijah and Moses was all they needed to reference regarding this to end the discussion. During this time of various religious research, I had spent countless hours reading internet comments and writings on people’s thoughts on various prophetic matters leading up to now. The connection we need to make, is that we have objectives to do before us! Revelations says, ‘And I will grant authority to my two witnesses, and they will prophesy for 1,260 days, clothed in sackcloth.’ It also says, ‘They have the power to shut the sky, that no rain may fall during the days of their prophesying.’ 1,260 days is the same duration as 3.5 years and the task of no rainfall helps affirm we need to see an exact game plan before us. The task of Elijah is part of the Revelation direction about the end of times. Don’t worry the designated areas of no rainfall are already severe drought areas in the desert! So can we confirm the Elijah initiative is a real thing to address in the year 2020? I sure hope we do!
This isn’t a matter to be dismissed by convenience or any form of pretension that seems louder otherwise. It’s a process systematically intertwined within the gospel. We also should remember we are dealing with the largest group associated practice in the history of existence (Religion: Christianity) that must be a solid and true practice, that relies on its connected ongoing soundness to be a proven component within the contextual belief that it stands for. The Elijah constituent within the material is and always has been meant to be active within the God ordained outline and agenda, which unfortunately hasn’t always been the case. We must strive to be better, as people earning their eternity, we shouldn’t restrict the material but be cautious and open with its various realities that doesn’t leave much out. Prior to this age when publishing was just getting started back in the bible days after Jesus’s death, literary development was behind the modern future mind during slow or changing times in existence; people often missed additional interpretations as they didn’t see updated translations and or missed many notions of gospel initiative altogether. We’ve made some errors up to this point with representing the practice, we cannot continue making it an art or craft to downplay things for the sake of preserving comfort in the now as though it’s the only best leadership. Your noble past effort to keep things conserved as is may not be warranted (even as a believer that knows to just defend pastors and churches in general as the starting and stopping point) doesn’t necessarily help to heal the cohesive value or better said function of the religion altogether.
Hopefully, even with some still a bit sour as will always be the case, we have progressed beyond bashing the church in this time before the end, in that all past accusations against the church can be diminished some, after enough modern time has passed, given the resolves and charities and good works the church has done these last decades is a loud good leading cause; not to mention, by doing something like a prophecy test it helps to show we follow through with a proper execution as something that should help to polish all things coming to completion – making it less of a historic example along the way, but a living practice caught up to speed from A to Z. Sometimes we keep control unnecessarily, we fight for worldly precepts errantly, we choose control and elementary teachings that don’t rely on faith or eternity but common decisions that best serve standard living conduct protection. This type of effort requires we really make it about a deeper meaning because things are going on just fine without this, people are busy making money and living, but the bible expects more calling out to the harvesters always telling us to be on edge awake and ready.
At times in our controversial past, we have tried to control life excessively, or make it the life goal to be restricted to an identical one image of what Christ in us is to be, and we’ve not been true with gauging living and time and production in our societies, failing on various passages that would have given us additional freedoms that would have made it easier on people; some of these tendencies can be attributed to past poor outlooks that didn’t factor enough on behalf of everyone, when social allowances (or deviances) throughout our history highlighted various forms of neglect from the church so to speak, where large majorities of practicing people in the church had low or no resolve, that could allow different harsh requirement outlooks and justifications failing to see God or humanity in others. Sex and modest parts are seen daily in relationships, caffeine creates a buzz, we get some sugar to eat as it pleasures the tongue, we get some wine to drink, but teaching things isn't always easy - especially given we can remember only a percentage of verses, ones that usually go with how we are earning rewards with our own good conduct. It would be better to be forgiven than bitter on this matter and remember that just as the covenant of Moses came to an end being deemed ‘obsolete,’ the new covenant of Christs spirit in us, that gives many defenses on living justified in faith and grace, is progressing to final expectation levels as exposure and maturation numbers help settle our impressions on various ways of conduct. The Revelations 11 Elijah operation stays within its boundaries in this regard, being a notable updated time needed objective that does not abolish current practice or statute, but reminds us of the eternal timeline and prophecy objectives before us.
This is a prophecy test that is open and good with much more than just Elijah tasks, that will help to skillfully resolve the zeal of church prerogative often questioned, that will defend the total practice and give information that helps to ease and surpass any overwhelmed feelings of this operation being a threat to human treatment or progress in general. This allotted timeframe we are now in, this purpose at hand intended for the time at hand before us, helps us to further reveal things appropriately one way or the other, as testing leads to further progress. Each resolve and scenario is delicately thought out to appease representation of the gospel in our lives, along with addressing the forewarnings we sometimes sidestep. A test can pass or fail, but you can’t skip it to find out. What does the New Testament say regarding this, ‘do not despise prophecies, but test everything; hold fast what is good.’ Christ returns in the prophecy test window and hallelujah its been a long time coming and people suffering will be thankful, it's a pass! If he fails to return in the window, then we established a prophecy and pass it virtually even if it's a fail on the better eternity to immediately come optimism that says a generation should not pass after Jerusalem was surrounded by armies and we witnessed its destruction as foretold (an event to occur that did, prior to end of first earth at the immediate end).
What is a prophecy? Can it be defined in a particular way and effort? Does the bible require we further evaluate this right now?
A prophecy is a future thing in the current time to carry out that is directed through biblical interpretation. Is a prophecy needed now though? Why create an additional reality and rationalization regarding this? Aren’t we supposed to die to the additional passions and desires of the world and let our lives be hidden in God with Christ? Is this too much of a thing to highlight, to make more of? Shouldn’t we have gotten the gist from the deeds of Elijah and the other prophets of the past, and our now new age maturity from history served to teach us to now rid ourselves of additional prophet tasks, but to let things finalize as is? Let the field with grass and weeds grow until the angel reapers separate us? Is not the practice already being tended to the degree needed, should we even change anything? Is it contrary to create a further prophetic operation anymore, to go further into interpretations of the word that could promote speculation more than proper stewardship and serving – aren’t we suppose to keep a righteous faith that doesn’t aim to isolate ourselves as ‘ones ascending or descending the Christ,’ but to instead carryout daily sound objectives as ‘we wait eagerly for the revealing of the sons and daughters of God?’ So why do this if things are in place and we can’t know the way the grass and weeds of the field grow until the very end that we don’t know the exact day and hour of? Because some passages need to be addressed (See Olive Tree Analogy) for purposes of action that, if left unaddressed would otherwise feel neglected, given we are people aware of decisions pushed on us throughout the gospel, as people of resolve willing to serve. If belief is supposed to be the truest decision starting point of our existence and greater survival, then we shouldn’t take this lightly and let it pass without effort.
Hype? The gospel isn’t hype right? Or is it?
Is the gospel a book of hype that expands directions more than our common reality decision making? Learn parables it says, learn symbolism, learn the extra belief component that involves sometimes tricky prophetic interpretations. How pinpoint is it really? Why is Jerusalem in Revelations ‘symbolically’ called ‘Sodom and Egypt,’ but Paul could correlate ‘present day Jerusalem’ in an ‘allegorical’ example of Hagar and Mount Sinai? Didn’t Jesus have to re-explain he meant ‘no I’m speaking of my body as the temple?’ It’s not too far-fetched for us to actualize a holy place temple in the modern electronic age, that includes all denominations of believers across the world, to have some correlation to Jerusalem defined modernly. It’s not a word only used for a literal area, it’s the home base reference dialect of categorized people that may not all live there.
With it tricky at times to understand, could it be hype how it gives examples and stresses heaven as the winning side victory, but the reality is it isn’t that different on the separation of the two worlds? Is it overblown, where it may harshly be read and interpreted that for not believing you will burn all eternity in the Lake of Fire but we come to find out the difference of heaven and hell is 24 ounces less of liquid a day as hells torment is really just overblown like the rest of the literature, not to mention sins and pleasure restrictions themselves are overblown as well? A gospel antagonist claiming it hype would say they don’t feel guilt for various sins in a cruel world with too much and too little time all bunched into the equation, I don’t need the extra self-control embrace as a holy teaching in my life! Maybe subsequently the threats and defined ‘wisdom’ for fear of the Lord isn’t really a straightforward warning or true wisdom to begin with? Should the isolated events within all the years of history up to this point in time also be diminished due to sparse coincidences that happened rarely along the way? Not very many miracles have happened regularly over the course of paperback history, that isn’t the most transparent type of revealing to us. To some it seems to be more of a tool used as a source of control to keep mankind in check, to keep us slightly more involved or entertained or busy thinking with or against each other, more so than as something representing sound bottom line information. It creates material, viewpoints, wishful optimism - that’s it?!
It’s true we often prefer to generalize it unspecifically in some ways, but isn’t that ok then given everything it entails? We shouldn’t just defend miracles plain as day, or defend each sentence or we’d look off! Doesn’t it sometimes, by creating additional standards of conduct, teach people to be more at enmity with each other, where believers alike have tendency to despise each other’s decisions and the criteria’s become unpleasant conversations given it says some things are sins for one and not for others, such as judgement between people doing errant behavior similarly (sin pointing), or for creating controversy regarding substances that enter the body and are expelled out of us, or examples when sometimes gospel direction seems wish washy like elder advice until you get 2-3 people to change his opinion or deal with shortened advice off simplistic teachings that leave you in an undesired state of asceticism - not factoring all things you go through.
It doesn’t always seem the most healthy or true decision in life, to serve Christ like each opportunity is so important, to really think people’s lives become changed with daily conversations with God, that it makes you happy or sad correct, and that following its predicate in front of believers and unbelievers alike is really a supported and distinguished unique decision to be part of. Then not to mention by association to others with expectations on Christian conduct, you can have additional hardships that can stem from others within the crowd (usually parent type teachings) seeing a firmer stance on what it really means to believe and live, that homeschooling exposure is what we all need and the experience gained outside of this protected mindset is only a fault. If it seems like hype to some good standing working class civilians that still despise the gospel more or less, then maybe we should all only grasp it cover to cover at say 67% max percentage grain of salt?! Or you’re a phony brainwashed Christian living a fictional reality, thinking more than you should on certain matters? How is it real, to live different for a gospel, to take things for more than a grain of salt on some of its implications, if things were written so long ago in ways mentioned already that don't always translate into a truer reality than the world of gravity, science, and rules we see around us everyday?
We save money for things in life, for our kids college, but does each thing we don’t buy really count towards our better stance and standing with Christianity? The bible talks about separating yourself from the flash of the world, but is that a short-sighted way to give yourself credit without really investing yourself into the literature? Wouldn’t God agree this only applicable to the degree you recognize standard decision making? We know some of the underlining teachings of Christianity don’t always translate into better people to people development, so can we hold that against the better affect of the gospel teaching in our lives? Too many people are sticklers with money and hide under various Christian umbrellas as ones who claim themselves as loving people, but withhold and refrain themselves from seeing more than just common decisions become their own self recognition?
Plus, how are you really supposed to not be one with the world that will hate and persecute you for believing as the Word states, yet while still being obligated to partake with outsiders as the Word also states, not find yourself in a scenario that isn’t that different from others – believer or not - going through and hashing out daily life details no different? Are we really different enough, between those that have belief compared to those that don’t, to take a fortified separated pragmatic religious stance as part of our eye and daily discernment of things and people around us? Does it really add up, do we really judge each other better because of the gospel? Many people are successful religious or not, many people face or deal with tempermates and emotions in their days, many people donate in similar enough ways. Are we really that different? The antagonist isn’t off or out of their minds to regard portions of gospel direction as over-inflated material; if they were to compare the bible to some standard policy manuals, they would argue in effect man-made policies are more direct and effective on exact requirements, also better at side stepping unneeded information such as evaluation of additional morality eternal factors, that can hinder living liberties unlike policies more about making money and following procedures others do.
Yet the gospel, regardless of our better wishful thinking, makes things life or death requiring us to believe and try. All the while we don’t follow it as unified or cordial as what some could deem a determining factor for upfront commitment, all the while belief stipulations remain looming in many people’s lives as the gospel remains a chunky time decision not worth the scrutiny of learning the material upfront, or changing a few things in our daily lives to better be in the safe zone, making life less easy at first glance on each thought or decision we then make. I don’t blame people who scrutinize religion or Christianity objectively! It’s good to remember, if we are to live a zillion years in our future spirit bodies, the differences do matter (between two eternal areas of living) and the bible has told us things upfront in a way we should have been responsive to, to accept it as a call with urgency (lest we choose not to). Example: ‘Better to be thrown into the bottom of the ocean with a millstone tied to your neck, than to teach an innocent someone to sin,’ or ‘better to cut one hand off and enter heaven with one hand than go to hell with both hands.’ It must be needed hype to write things the way it does, maybe that’s the conclusion, given we are being conditioned with free decisions before us always ongoing, to be responsive to intricate life decisions as human beings with a conscious, so we must weigh the material and decision and recognize how to fit things into place properly with this all. Some hype maybe, but needed hype definitely.
With it tricky at times to understand, could it be hype how it gives examples and stresses heaven as the winning side victory, but the reality is it isn’t that different on the separation of the two worlds? Is it overblown, where it may harshly be read and interpreted that for not believing you will burn all eternity in the Lake of Fire but we come to find out the difference of heaven and hell is 24 ounces less of liquid a day as hells torment is really just overblown like the rest of the literature, not to mention sins and pleasure restrictions themselves are overblown as well? A gospel antagonist claiming it hype would say they don’t feel guilt for various sins in a cruel world with too much and too little time all bunched into the equation, I don’t need the extra self-control embrace as a holy teaching in my life! Maybe subsequently the threats and defined ‘wisdom’ for fear of the Lord isn’t really a straightforward warning or true wisdom to begin with? Should the isolated events within all the years of history up to this point in time also be diminished due to sparse coincidences that happened rarely along the way? Not very many miracles have happened regularly over the course of paperback history, that isn’t the most transparent type of revealing to us. To some it seems to be more of a tool used as a source of control to keep mankind in check, to keep us slightly more involved or entertained or busy thinking with or against each other, more so than as something representing sound bottom line information. It creates material, viewpoints, wishful optimism - that’s it?!
It’s true we often prefer to generalize it unspecifically in some ways, but isn’t that ok then given everything it entails? We shouldn’t just defend miracles plain as day, or defend each sentence or we’d look off! Doesn’t it sometimes, by creating additional standards of conduct, teach people to be more at enmity with each other, where believers alike have tendency to despise each other’s decisions and the criteria’s become unpleasant conversations given it says some things are sins for one and not for others, such as judgement between people doing errant behavior similarly (sin pointing), or for creating controversy regarding substances that enter the body and are expelled out of us, or examples when sometimes gospel direction seems wish washy like elder advice until you get 2-3 people to change his opinion or deal with shortened advice off simplistic teachings that leave you in an undesired state of asceticism - not factoring all things you go through.
It doesn’t always seem the most healthy or true decision in life, to serve Christ like each opportunity is so important, to really think people’s lives become changed with daily conversations with God, that it makes you happy or sad correct, and that following its predicate in front of believers and unbelievers alike is really a supported and distinguished unique decision to be part of. Then not to mention by association to others with expectations on Christian conduct, you can have additional hardships that can stem from others within the crowd (usually parent type teachings) seeing a firmer stance on what it really means to believe and live, that homeschooling exposure is what we all need and the experience gained outside of this protected mindset is only a fault. If it seems like hype to some good standing working class civilians that still despise the gospel more or less, then maybe we should all only grasp it cover to cover at say 67% max percentage grain of salt?! Or you’re a phony brainwashed Christian living a fictional reality, thinking more than you should on certain matters? How is it real, to live different for a gospel, to take things for more than a grain of salt on some of its implications, if things were written so long ago in ways mentioned already that don't always translate into a truer reality than the world of gravity, science, and rules we see around us everyday?
We save money for things in life, for our kids college, but does each thing we don’t buy really count towards our better stance and standing with Christianity? The bible talks about separating yourself from the flash of the world, but is that a short-sighted way to give yourself credit without really investing yourself into the literature? Wouldn’t God agree this only applicable to the degree you recognize standard decision making? We know some of the underlining teachings of Christianity don’t always translate into better people to people development, so can we hold that against the better affect of the gospel teaching in our lives? Too many people are sticklers with money and hide under various Christian umbrellas as ones who claim themselves as loving people, but withhold and refrain themselves from seeing more than just common decisions become their own self recognition?
Plus, how are you really supposed to not be one with the world that will hate and persecute you for believing as the Word states, yet while still being obligated to partake with outsiders as the Word also states, not find yourself in a scenario that isn’t that different from others – believer or not - going through and hashing out daily life details no different? Are we really different enough, between those that have belief compared to those that don’t, to take a fortified separated pragmatic religious stance as part of our eye and daily discernment of things and people around us? Does it really add up, do we really judge each other better because of the gospel? Many people are successful religious or not, many people face or deal with tempermates and emotions in their days, many people donate in similar enough ways. Are we really that different? The antagonist isn’t off or out of their minds to regard portions of gospel direction as over-inflated material; if they were to compare the bible to some standard policy manuals, they would argue in effect man-made policies are more direct and effective on exact requirements, also better at side stepping unneeded information such as evaluation of additional morality eternal factors, that can hinder living liberties unlike policies more about making money and following procedures others do.
Yet the gospel, regardless of our better wishful thinking, makes things life or death requiring us to believe and try. All the while we don’t follow it as unified or cordial as what some could deem a determining factor for upfront commitment, all the while belief stipulations remain looming in many people’s lives as the gospel remains a chunky time decision not worth the scrutiny of learning the material upfront, or changing a few things in our daily lives to better be in the safe zone, making life less easy at first glance on each thought or decision we then make. I don’t blame people who scrutinize religion or Christianity objectively! It’s good to remember, if we are to live a zillion years in our future spirit bodies, the differences do matter (between two eternal areas of living) and the bible has told us things upfront in a way we should have been responsive to, to accept it as a call with urgency (lest we choose not to). Example: ‘Better to be thrown into the bottom of the ocean with a millstone tied to your neck, than to teach an innocent someone to sin,’ or ‘better to cut one hand off and enter heaven with one hand than go to hell with both hands.’ It must be needed hype to write things the way it does, maybe that’s the conclusion, given we are being conditioned with free decisions before us always ongoing, to be responsive to intricate life decisions as human beings with a conscious, so we must weigh the material and decision and recognize how to fit things into place properly with this all. Some hype maybe, but needed hype definitely.
How do we make a prophecy manifest?
Is the gospel really alive in our realities, so much so that we would alter living our lives differently on its behalf, based on some of the implications and tests that it presses upon us - to not just settle living our best happy lives of partial availability where we eat, drink, and work with the rest of the world similar enough to everyone else, while keeping various awareness’s within our life circles that prefers us to maintain a safe belief distance from the extra additional gospel strategy and resolve? Sure, the gospel may be as extreme as to say some people are supposed to martyr, but to the rest of us living secure in our lives, gospel association isn’t worth an additional harassment in our lives if it comes to an additional effort and scenario that could bring additional negative attention? Life, family, orchestrated involvement, and financials is enough to keep up with, let’s keep things broadly generalized and do no further effort other than the involvement we’ve settled on - things are fine as is right? Maybe to you, but not everyone! We have to learn to hate that others around the world are struggling and the knowledge of the difference from heaven and hell is a required responsibility not to be neglected, that while church should be an interest since it connects us with each other sharing an eternal assurance part of the belief, we need to embrace that things leading to the end separation are not all vain or unproductive thoughts. Would a prophecy effort done help change belief by 1% in a true way of heart across the world? Quite likely, even when false stories can and will likely mask the Elijah miracles if they come to pass in our day, the objective being carried out professionally should give us this percent regardless of the verified rainfall or water to blood Revelation 11 tasks that will further be revealed as things playout.
Isn’t hype about pointing out that some things are over scrutinized, or unaddressed appropriately, or marginalized correctly? Isn’t that kinda how we see many segments of the gospel? We should remember that, teachings aren’t always directed or needed for everyone to the same degree (remember the ‘law was laid down not for the righteous but unrighteous’ to create guilt and judgement), so some marginalization is true in our grasp of its direction. Nevertheless, we have to be specific or we pick and choose a practice that doesn’t represent its full scope. Remember God has handled mankind’s progress throughout all the ages, He didn’t just let us all have the same language and let civilization progress rapidly, He destroyed the tower of Babel to keep things at His manageable speed and handle and diversity. It isn’t just about pointing out the hype accusations we can make but to remember its peace mandate always takes precedence and to figure out how to narrow our focus with it all in the modern age we’ve now attained to. The prophets of the past were in different situations, with different time decisions, with different exposure and resources, things that seem like hype were part of timed objectives of God up to now.
To help make it manifest, we have to see the need for it. That while believing should be a proper survival decision, we need to regard that additional expectations for this type of scenario is needed and even allowed for some of the people late to the party. It’s not madness for people to call it all a bluff and remember that ultimately we didn’t live that differently on earth with other believers and thus hell shouldn’t be that different, as its still off to condemn other religions along the way. If portions within the book are left more or less completely unaddressed out to 2019 (such as defining ‘a prophecy’ in our New Testament current age), can we conclude things written in the past had their purpose, may still give guidance, but too much time has lapsed for too long by now, without it really pushing further its living reality in the equation? Don’t we get more innocent the longer things go unproven as things become more aberrant century after century? Heck billions may claim a Christian association, but even with popular vote association ‘growing as the largest religion,’ it didn’t really progress beyond common assembly expectations that seem lackluster, where good people good to others, still don’t just buy into it.
Does the gospel want more from us, so to help hedge against hype accusations? What does it say about the discipleship call? It says we must deny our lives, but are we really doing that? It says that by denying life in various ways, it somehow highlights or opens opportunity for us to magnify eternal calls that show to ourselves and others the faith decisions of future heaven we are working towards, that they are in fact ever so important to recognize. Maybe it took Daniel and Zechariah fasting for others to grasp the denial decisions in connection with their cause? Why does it say you have to hate your life to find it, that unless you’re willing to hate even family members at times for his name’s sake, that you are not deemed worthy otherwise? That unless you renounce all that you have, you can’t be categorized as a disciple? Are some of these verses, that require further interpretation, over scrutinized and better left unaddressed? We are concluding to the next section (Matthew Levi) that comes before the Olive Tree Analogy prophecy section, but first let’s finish with concluding this book isn’t just hyped up material but a book of eternal implications.
We save money for things in life, for our kids college, but does each thing we don’t buy really count towards our better stance and standing with Christianity? The bible talks about separating yourself from the flash of the world, but is that a short-sighted way to give yourself credit without really investing yourself into the literature? Wouldn’t God agree this only applicable to the degree you recognize standard decision making? We know some of the underlining teachings of Christianity don’t always translate into better people to people development, so can we hold that against the better affect of the gospel teaching in our lives? Too many people are sticklers with money and hide under various Christian umbrellas as ones who claim themselves as loving people, but withhold and refrain themselves from seeing more than just common decisions become their own self recognition? Plus, how are you really supposed to not be one with the world that will hate and persecute you for believing as the Word states, yet while still being obligated to partake with outsiders as the Word also states, not find yourself in a scenario that isn’t that different from others – believer or not - going through and hashing out daily life details no different? Are we really different enough, between those that have belief compared to those that don’t, to take a fortified separated pragmatic religious stance as part of our eye and daily discernment of things and people around us? Does it really add up, do we really judge each other better because of the gospel? Many people are successful religious or not, many people face or deal with tempermates and emotions in their days, many people donate in similar enough ways. Are we really that different? The antagonist isn’t off or out of their minds to regard portions of gospel direction as over-inflated material; if they were to compare the bible to some standard policy manuals, they would argue in effect man-made policies are more direct and effective on exact requirements, also better at side stepping unneeded information such as evaluation of additional morality eternal factors, that can hinder living liberties unlike policies more about making money and following procedures others do.
Yet the gospel, regardless of our better wishful thinking, makes things life or death requiring us to believe and try. All the while we don’t follow it as unified or cordial as what some could deem a determining factor for upfront commitment, all the while belief stipulations remain looming in many people’s lives as the gospel remains a chunky time decision not worth the scrutiny of learning the material upfront, or changing a few things in our daily lives to better be in the safe zone, making life less easy at first glance on each thought or decision we then make. I don’t blame people who scrutinize religion or Christianity objectively! It’s good to remember, if we are to live a zillion years in our future spirit bodies, the differences do matter (between two eternal areas of living) and the bible has told us things upfront in a way we should have been responsive to, to accept it as a call with urgency (lest we choose not to). Example: ‘Better to be thrown into the bottom of the ocean with a millstone tied to your neck, than to teach an innocent someone to sin,’ or ‘better to cut one hand off and enter heaven with one hand than go to hell with both hands.’ It must be needed hype to write things the way it does, maybe that’s the conclusion, given we are being conditioned with free decisions before us always ongoing, to be responsive to intricate life decisions as human beings with a conscious, so we must weigh the material and decision and recognize how to fit things into place properly with this all. Some hype maybe, but needed hype definitely.
Isn’t hype about pointing out that some things are over scrutinized, or unaddressed appropriately, or marginalized correctly? Isn’t that kinda how we see many segments of the gospel? We should remember that, teachings aren’t always directed or needed for everyone to the same degree (remember the ‘law was laid down not for the righteous but unrighteous’ to create guilt and judgement), so some marginalization is true in our grasp of its direction. Nevertheless, we have to be specific or we pick and choose a practice that doesn’t represent its full scope. Remember God has handled mankind’s progress throughout all the ages, He didn’t just let us all have the same language and let civilization progress rapidly, He destroyed the tower of Babel to keep things at His manageable speed and handle and diversity. It isn’t just about pointing out the hype accusations we can make but to remember its peace mandate always takes precedence and to figure out how to narrow our focus with it all in the modern age we’ve now attained to. The prophets of the past were in different situations, with different time decisions, with different exposure and resources, things that seem like hype were part of timed objectives of God up to now.
To help make it manifest, we have to see the need for it. That while believing should be a proper survival decision, we need to regard that additional expectations for this type of scenario is needed and even allowed for some of the people late to the party. It’s not madness for people to call it all a bluff and remember that ultimately we didn’t live that differently on earth with other believers and thus hell shouldn’t be that different, as its still off to condemn other religions along the way. If portions within the book are left more or less completely unaddressed out to 2019 (such as defining ‘a prophecy’ in our New Testament current age), can we conclude things written in the past had their purpose, may still give guidance, but too much time has lapsed for too long by now, without it really pushing further its living reality in the equation? Don’t we get more innocent the longer things go unproven as things become more aberrant century after century? Heck billions may claim a Christian association, but even with popular vote association ‘growing as the largest religion,’ it didn’t really progress beyond common assembly expectations that seem lackluster, where good people good to others, still don’t just buy into it.
Does the gospel want more from us, so to help hedge against hype accusations? What does it say about the discipleship call? It says we must deny our lives, but are we really doing that? It says that by denying life in various ways, it somehow highlights or opens opportunity for us to magnify eternal calls that show to ourselves and others the faith decisions of future heaven we are working towards, that they are in fact ever so important to recognize. Maybe it took Daniel and Zechariah fasting for others to grasp the denial decisions in connection with their cause? Why does it say you have to hate your life to find it, that unless you’re willing to hate even family members at times for his name’s sake, that you are not deemed worthy otherwise? That unless you renounce all that you have, you can’t be categorized as a disciple? Are some of these verses, that require further interpretation, over scrutinized and better left unaddressed? We are concluding to the next section (Matthew Levi) that comes before the Olive Tree Analogy prophecy section, but first let’s finish with concluding this book isn’t just hyped up material but a book of eternal implications.
We save money for things in life, for our kids college, but does each thing we don’t buy really count towards our better stance and standing with Christianity? The bible talks about separating yourself from the flash of the world, but is that a short-sighted way to give yourself credit without really investing yourself into the literature? Wouldn’t God agree this only applicable to the degree you recognize standard decision making? We know some of the underlining teachings of Christianity don’t always translate into better people to people development, so can we hold that against the better affect of the gospel teaching in our lives? Too many people are sticklers with money and hide under various Christian umbrellas as ones who claim themselves as loving people, but withhold and refrain themselves from seeing more than just common decisions become their own self recognition? Plus, how are you really supposed to not be one with the world that will hate and persecute you for believing as the Word states, yet while still being obligated to partake with outsiders as the Word also states, not find yourself in a scenario that isn’t that different from others – believer or not - going through and hashing out daily life details no different? Are we really different enough, between those that have belief compared to those that don’t, to take a fortified separated pragmatic religious stance as part of our eye and daily discernment of things and people around us? Does it really add up, do we really judge each other better because of the gospel? Many people are successful religious or not, many people face or deal with tempermates and emotions in their days, many people donate in similar enough ways. Are we really that different? The antagonist isn’t off or out of their minds to regard portions of gospel direction as over-inflated material; if they were to compare the bible to some standard policy manuals, they would argue in effect man-made policies are more direct and effective on exact requirements, also better at side stepping unneeded information such as evaluation of additional morality eternal factors, that can hinder living liberties unlike policies more about making money and following procedures others do.
Yet the gospel, regardless of our better wishful thinking, makes things life or death requiring us to believe and try. All the while we don’t follow it as unified or cordial as what some could deem a determining factor for upfront commitment, all the while belief stipulations remain looming in many people’s lives as the gospel remains a chunky time decision not worth the scrutiny of learning the material upfront, or changing a few things in our daily lives to better be in the safe zone, making life less easy at first glance on each thought or decision we then make. I don’t blame people who scrutinize religion or Christianity objectively! It’s good to remember, if we are to live a zillion years in our future spirit bodies, the differences do matter (between two eternal areas of living) and the bible has told us things upfront in a way we should have been responsive to, to accept it as a call with urgency (lest we choose not to). Example: ‘Better to be thrown into the bottom of the ocean with a millstone tied to your neck, than to teach an innocent someone to sin,’ or ‘better to cut one hand off and enter heaven with one hand than go to hell with both hands.’ It must be needed hype to write things the way it does, maybe that’s the conclusion, given we are being conditioned with free decisions before us always ongoing, to be responsive to intricate life decisions as human beings with a conscious, so we must weigh the material and decision and recognize how to fit things into place properly with this all. Some hype maybe, but needed hype definitely.
But it's not as specific, or not specific enough, it's all still hype!
Hype continues to say that the signs of the bible aren’t as loud in the modern age, big whoop on another earthquake or famine, is this true? Yea I suppose, given when enough time passes things that once were are no longer as loud, especially when centuries pass without significant intervention. Even when we see and reference these various signs and birth pangs happening to the earth it talks about – wars, rumors of wars, earthquakes, famines, pestilences in various areas – that these things don’t really trigger us to that much of a further degree. We are aware that even with the knowledge of signs to have occurred now before us more than ever with electronics, that all the way to the end people will be saying there is ‘peace and security,’ so the assumption is these warnings are more so common enough occurrences within mankind that it doesn’t prompt things to the degree needed for the bibles intended rationalization on the matter to truly manifest in our reality. That to define these occurrences as signs, given the population’s exposure to the hundredth or thousandths earthquake or famine is no new ordeal, thus silencing additional faith that these signs are part of the forewarnings of the end coming closer.
It says people living at the close of the age will be concerned with the roar of the sea and the waves, with the foreboding of the worlds end coming upon all those who dwell on the face of the earth, which is true and false at the same time in our modern reality. We don’t like to connect final earth instruction to a one source religion over the others, so thinking on the apocalypse or other thoughts regarding this is an outlet; yet it is true people still do acknowledge the earth tribulation, the problem is linking it to Christianity that may instead create a quick scoff since tied to religion. Can’t we all just believe or not believe naively and were better off that way? Are we not naïve people to speculate on the matter in the first place, or speculative religious zealots if too much the other way? With these groups of people as unbelieving end time apocalypse prepper dreamers, end time conspiracists, and groups in and out of the church with all sorts of varying opinions on the matter, we know this conversation is part of proper reasoning to some degree but not necessarily utilized as an outward matter of biblical agenda. Many Christians take the mindset to not go there on the end, live each day out right and what happens will – but doing it this way doesn’t show further obligation to prove true the material and change the matter of heart (or urgency) in others. It may be true the closing of the age before the final return of Christ isn’t really intended to become a concern within our day to day realities and thus shouldn’t be over addressed within the current practice, but are we doing things sufficiently enough for the ongoing will of God to do our deeds here on earth properly? To be a night manager, a virgin candle oil holder, to not be a pharisee that can tell the weather in the sky but avoids the signs of the times, does this mean taking the proper embrace regarding the end matters? Contextually I’d say so, or your missing something that has something to do with defense of non-believers still coming to the party.
Draught has occurred in areas with low rainfall throughout all history, yet Elijah, who prayed fervently that the skies would shut and no rain would fall on the land, was still highlighted to have taken and received credit for initiating 3.5 years of draught, before he then prayed for the rain to fall again. That even some of his large miracles were hype to the total reality of people having to choose to believe various occurrences because they only happened during isolated far off scenarios (only Zarephath the widow) so infrequent and absurd that it doesn’t make belief straight forward as it should be, as straight forward as if we saw the miracles first hand – especially in our already busy or tiresome lives? Should we be blamed for low enthusiasm or belief on these matters? Even the signs of the moon and stars, the rare eclipses, the blood moons that we’ve seen have always occurred throughout the ages, so why is it supposed to be significant to the people at the time of the end 2,000 years later? Living now with advanced equipment and material on such things that we have now been tracking for centuries, doesn’t science and mankind’s achievement give us an honest out from belief conformity? Hopefully you are seeing the mix and match of interpretation regarding conclusions we are in fact in the final time slot.
Even the prophesied pillars and plumes of smoke occurred in various ways back then too. In disaster war-stricken zones, fire causes pillars of smoke; I’m sure the people saw these things during invasions each century along the way even without TV news reporting. Maybe they were aware of plumes of ash, like they were aware of earthquakes such as the one that occurred during the time of Uzziah king of Judah two years after Amos first experienced the vision among the shepherds of Tekoa? Yea we saw pillars of smoke at the fall of the twin towers of 9/11, but so did they and many others during wars that have occurred from then to now. Why magnify common occurrence as signs, and why do these things matter as eye opening occurrences to us in this age? Wouldn’t it matter more to them back then, where say a meteor shower became a community conversation become like a television special back then, as an event to be aware of regarding the creator – whereas now we have more visual options of time spending and the repetitive exposure up to now no longer seems magnified any longer? And now centuries later we are supposed to get giddy over these prophesied signs? We’ve went through a zillion scenarios and only 50 times there have been recorded miracles over the last 5,000 years (not to mention the conflicting information on the millions of years of earth crust formation leading up to the advancement of humans) so c’mon give us a break! To conclude, some say hype hype hype, but it should be about belief belief belief. Belief needs to exist so we desire to live eternally, and then we get the free gift of the better living scenario – but belief isn’t just easy to conform to. Now regarding what was said about discipleship, about how it would tie into the modern prophetic agenda, click here to go to the next page, part 3 of the prophecy actualization.
It says people living at the close of the age will be concerned with the roar of the sea and the waves, with the foreboding of the worlds end coming upon all those who dwell on the face of the earth, which is true and false at the same time in our modern reality. We don’t like to connect final earth instruction to a one source religion over the others, so thinking on the apocalypse or other thoughts regarding this is an outlet; yet it is true people still do acknowledge the earth tribulation, the problem is linking it to Christianity that may instead create a quick scoff since tied to religion. Can’t we all just believe or not believe naively and were better off that way? Are we not naïve people to speculate on the matter in the first place, or speculative religious zealots if too much the other way? With these groups of people as unbelieving end time apocalypse prepper dreamers, end time conspiracists, and groups in and out of the church with all sorts of varying opinions on the matter, we know this conversation is part of proper reasoning to some degree but not necessarily utilized as an outward matter of biblical agenda. Many Christians take the mindset to not go there on the end, live each day out right and what happens will – but doing it this way doesn’t show further obligation to prove true the material and change the matter of heart (or urgency) in others. It may be true the closing of the age before the final return of Christ isn’t really intended to become a concern within our day to day realities and thus shouldn’t be over addressed within the current practice, but are we doing things sufficiently enough for the ongoing will of God to do our deeds here on earth properly? To be a night manager, a virgin candle oil holder, to not be a pharisee that can tell the weather in the sky but avoids the signs of the times, does this mean taking the proper embrace regarding the end matters? Contextually I’d say so, or your missing something that has something to do with defense of non-believers still coming to the party.
Draught has occurred in areas with low rainfall throughout all history, yet Elijah, who prayed fervently that the skies would shut and no rain would fall on the land, was still highlighted to have taken and received credit for initiating 3.5 years of draught, before he then prayed for the rain to fall again. That even some of his large miracles were hype to the total reality of people having to choose to believe various occurrences because they only happened during isolated far off scenarios (only Zarephath the widow) so infrequent and absurd that it doesn’t make belief straight forward as it should be, as straight forward as if we saw the miracles first hand – especially in our already busy or tiresome lives? Should we be blamed for low enthusiasm or belief on these matters? Even the signs of the moon and stars, the rare eclipses, the blood moons that we’ve seen have always occurred throughout the ages, so why is it supposed to be significant to the people at the time of the end 2,000 years later? Living now with advanced equipment and material on such things that we have now been tracking for centuries, doesn’t science and mankind’s achievement give us an honest out from belief conformity? Hopefully you are seeing the mix and match of interpretation regarding conclusions we are in fact in the final time slot.
Even the prophesied pillars and plumes of smoke occurred in various ways back then too. In disaster war-stricken zones, fire causes pillars of smoke; I’m sure the people saw these things during invasions each century along the way even without TV news reporting. Maybe they were aware of plumes of ash, like they were aware of earthquakes such as the one that occurred during the time of Uzziah king of Judah two years after Amos first experienced the vision among the shepherds of Tekoa? Yea we saw pillars of smoke at the fall of the twin towers of 9/11, but so did they and many others during wars that have occurred from then to now. Why magnify common occurrence as signs, and why do these things matter as eye opening occurrences to us in this age? Wouldn’t it matter more to them back then, where say a meteor shower became a community conversation become like a television special back then, as an event to be aware of regarding the creator – whereas now we have more visual options of time spending and the repetitive exposure up to now no longer seems magnified any longer? And now centuries later we are supposed to get giddy over these prophesied signs? We’ve went through a zillion scenarios and only 50 times there have been recorded miracles over the last 5,000 years (not to mention the conflicting information on the millions of years of earth crust formation leading up to the advancement of humans) so c’mon give us a break! To conclude, some say hype hype hype, but it should be about belief belief belief. Belief needs to exist so we desire to live eternally, and then we get the free gift of the better living scenario – but belief isn’t just easy to conform to. Now regarding what was said about discipleship, about how it would tie into the modern prophetic agenda, click here to go to the next page, part 3 of the prophecy actualization.
OLD CONTENT BELOW BEING REMOVED BY DATE
This is no knew thing in the bible, people take calls and go through the process of reasoning out their faith through testing and continual effort. If they cooperated together for a collection effort in Acts, if they continually had to physically build up the temple in Jerusalem, or the foundation of Zion 'that at times was desolate or trampled upon, with contrary practice' than this type of thought is still contextually healthy. The 'let the reader understand' reference, or 'to those with ears,' means you who are called must problem solve additionally and be forced (with no option to shrink back) to proclaim all that needs to be addressed by connecting material and process. We have this time-frame we are in to accomplish feats of past prophetic agenda, to heal interpretation of the decisions of those times, to magnify directions given to the future, to consciously be better spared from the last hour, to not be ‘the desolate camp,’ with no sanctuary restored options for the modern Daniel vision update that dot’s the i’ and crosses the t’s for gospel gentile fulfillment to the ends of the earth.
The prophets of the past lived for us in our day, they understood time spent in the future was not only their form of additional excitement but protection against movements of organized mob tendency that would develop and otherwise stop final preaching. Don’t get me wrong, some were more old school – Ezra knew how roundabout ways of choosing God 2nd allowed the entirety of belief to become whitewashed (preserving systematic approaches), others like Daniel and Zechariah got spiritual and emotionally affected about the state of the future times; all of them contributed to their own time and the future in different ways. In our day, with no opportunity to add books to the bible, we climax to the end of the first heaven and earth that is to be burnt to a crisp and destroyed. In 1 Peter 1:12 it is written ‘It was revealed to them that they were serving not themselves but you, in the things that have now been announced to you through those who preached the good news to you by the Holy Spirit sent from heaven, things into which angels long to look.’ Not only did they carry out prophetic fulfillment during the exciting Pentecost times, such as to pick up serpents with their hands; and if they drink any deadly poison, it will not hurt them; they will lay their hands on the sick, and they will recover – not to mention speaking in new tongues and raising the dead to life as prophetic fulfillment completed almost immediately on the spot, but they had additional requirement to speak out future direction to a time ‘far or near off,’ regarding the day of gloom and darkness and thick clouds known to them as the day of the Lord.
Paul would have said to himself, could it be in my lifetime – the return of Christ? Yes, it could be he would respond. Regardless, the work before me says the appointed time is right now for building the early church. Thus saying ‘the time is short,’ the ‘last hour is at hand,’ is the only prophetic textual linguistic way to give communication in a responsible manner to the future – or else the 2nd generation from that time becomes more lackadaisical than the 3rd & then possibly 4th, as we no longer feel the urgency of the night manager. Similar to keeping the sackcloth pressure, to prophesy vision and future for 3.5 years even if it’s 10 year before it’s all accumulated into God’s timing.
Paul said things directly to a future time, that he interpreted could be days, years, or generations out from his life. What did he say through his reasoning? He said, create a modern vision (while focused on his current time objectives). He had just revealed a new mystery of the gospel, that the gentiles are fellow heirs and he undoubtedly was aware of the gospel being preached to the ends of the earth before the coming (the ends of the earth shall likely grow across the sea and the four corners of the earth we’re fully defined or explored); so continue the prophetic word kept in check by its limits and restrictions. Yet did he not see out further than his time is short appointed time attitude? He did see out further. How so? To start with we could use 1 Corinthians 1:20 ‘Where is the one who is wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age?’ Aware of prophetic interpretation himself, though this verse egging on the call into a future cooperation, we interpret his revealing’s further when saying two different times in Corinthians ‘imitate me,’ that meant not only imitate him through conduct in Christ, but through the acceptance of the call of apostlehood and prophetic decisions of our own age that would be rationalized by capabilities of the modern up to speed mind. Paul was not shy to bring out future prophetic calls and allowances of interpretation in this regard, to distinctly include the practices entirety.
1 Timothy 1:18 ‘This charge I entrust to you, Timothy, my child, in accordance with the prophecies previously made about you, that by them you may wage the good warfare, holding faith and a good conscience.” Timothy, who wasn’t John the Baptist referencing Isaiah about himself, was deemed reliable in his interpretation to fulfill prophetic faith through his grandmother, his own study, and Paul’s leadership affirmation. Paul recognized him as a true servant, and even more than that, as a prophetic character living it out as a soldier in Christ. Yet are we so quick, in the modern age, to rule out any resurface of this biblical process? Before I delve further into ‘Matthew Levi’ (which is a double name third person usage of money abstract allowance) concerning this one solution source of modern prophetic update prior to the end, I’ll further work to generalize the Elijah Revelation witness interpretation that supports this exploration and execution. Why underline ‘entrust’ as well? Mutually exclusive or not - not to peg my compounding rationalization style of determinacy - I underlined ‘entrust’ as well because of 1 Timothy 6:20 (whether directly connected or not to the first chapter prophetic reference isn’t the determining factor to talk about) that says ‘O Timothy, guard the deposit entrusted to you’ which also used the word entrust. I believe a safe interpretation would that, given the details of the man of lawlessness having access to riches, to a collection teaching of giving being associated to the restrictions of the Mark of the Beast, along with prophetic initiative decision making that has terms to what we can do or not - what is allowed or should be addressed – that in this prophetic belief, someone in the modern age as a CFO working with the church treasury formation will be entrusted to see this through, via in what we now call in the modern age a ‘company.’
Is Matthew Levi or the CFO required to represent the branches of the Romans Olive Tree prophecy as prophets of the two witnesses out of Revelations 11 initially prophetically manifested through Zechariah 4? Yes in the leadership approach acceptance. Yes in the taking on of the prophet role. But how many people also have to take on future callings that require effort to get there by additional upfront belief in it as well? A president may believe in his presidency before it occurs later on in his life, so also can there always be people with future thought and effort (as long as we’re all on the same team) about being the end time prophets of the Lord. I personally don’t care, don’t really like the total scenario, just need someone (and others) to step up with this enough to know we’re all similar or what I need to do to further catch up.
Is role of prophet glamour? It hasn’t been in the past, though I’m sure it had some excitement connected to it in those times more than now. Jesus was rejected by his own, John had people do to him as they pleased, Elijah was in the same nature as us, and in the last times no one needs to be taught love for we all know God in us through the second commandment. As continually said before, ‘the law written on stone is now surpassed by the written law on our new hearts of not flesh but spirit.’ It’s a role that is a common job, with a few hyped alterations into gravity reality (sparse miracle) that doesn’t satisfy life living. Jeremiah worked for decades being recognized lightly and dismissed along the way, Paul took decades to get people to further accept the new faith often waiting on letter and voyage, Elijah only did a few miracles a handful of times, and all of them couldn’t get mass verification (thus it was too absurd for a common recognition from the masses to believe outside of everyday living). Speaking in Revelation 11 witness language in the modern times, even with water to blood, draught, or curses that need not be admitted or rationalized, false media can always change material (and or deny IP or broadcasting reach) not to mention disbelief can always create enough comfort in others. Global warming and draughts is no new thing! Water can look like blood or be dyed! People have misfortune, curses and fairy tales aren’t real! It’s good to remind ourselves, who are we all but dust to God, the verse that says ‘what is man that you God are mindful of us?’ Yet being created in His image we are beloved if we follow the code, and God’s size diminishes our differences as He need not show partiality. He even defines hate as a goodbye word to prolonged inefficient people vessels (to those who don’t follow the code).
We’re all blessed differently with irrevocable gifts that require we find our own rhythm’s. The unsurpassable glory of heaven has variances of silver, gold, & angels (though a gold heart surpasses a silver discernment). The glory of hell (regarding our spiritual being bodies) includes a worm that doesn’t rot. Life itself is dealing with time and needs, a Christian should be content to live in their minds and spirit and not the vanity of additional false needs or titles. Not all people read well, not all people interpret well, not all people can move forward with further life objectives, but are grounded (or hindered) to stay sound executing in their daily lives of integrity. These people are unaware of opponent methodology that people can actually be serpents when you think they are clothed in sheep’s clothing dialoging properly with you. A person could be a false prophecy ‘I am he,’ and not learn prophetic additional memory as an opponent already self-deemed as condemned representing a hardened disbeliever conditioned to fear hell not, aware of the predestined grave (said in a human retrospective finger pointing kind of way) of the not-so-righteous God who created condemnation and evil into the story in the first place.
A Muslim that can ‘spiritually kill’ a Christian – that Muhammad made an awareness of, could be the antagonist who you may at times side with. Thus a person in authority (Muslim killer or not) can conveniently side with shared outlooks of all ages and differences of people, only to then slander, steal, lie & twist allegiance, give false honor as a means for their advantage, to feel entitled within themselves that controlled manipulation & handling is part of a task (verse just being a mere creature of instinct) as the ‘I am he’ god amongst gods or a star of image super personality person of power that wins by stomping and trampling nemeses. The bible talks of a future time when not only the gospel grows as the largest plant tree in the garden, but the antichrist movement also grows and creates their own objectives to ‘desolate the totality of the church practice.’ To the opponents, the victory is to make the bible history, pegged as common assembly, to make it regular repetitive practice less grandeur and complete than the varying agnostic afterlife beliefs (also a speculation they would say) as the smarter victors more wise in this age and the what could be age to come. Some opponents understand prophetic interpretation (even to role themselves into ‘I am he’ mindsets to gain the best thoughts – even if to slay or gain further miracle fig tree wither) and sit back and see all those things written ages ago while continually watching and or remembering the small and great Christians still using first information and unresolv∙ing responses; now the practice is but nice worship and and…and fizz! Some opponents are creatures of instinct, some are Baal prophets.
Why did John the Baptist say when asked, that he himself is not Elijah, yet Jesus said John was Elijah to come? To interpret a recurrence within a process of biblical prophet agenda. No, says John, I am not literally Elijah - we do not reincarnate, I’m in my own mind. Though, he would continue, I am associated to this verse out of Isaiah saying I am ‘he from the wilderness to make straight the path to Jesus’s ministry.’ This understanding means we can’t look around for everyone other than the people around you for a prophet figurehead, rather that it takes time and effort and without these lyrical inklings, the call may never have been further developed. Let’s take a quick look at Matthew 17 verses 10 through 13. ‘And the disciples asked him, “Then why do the scribes say that first Elijah must come?” He answered, “Elijah does come, and he will restore all things. But I tell you that Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him, but did to him whatever they pleased. So also the Son of Man will certainly suffer at their hands.” Then the disciples understood that he was speaking to them of John the Baptist.’
New information isn’t always safe information and an inclination is to cut off the material from unnecessary speculation or scrutiny. Rather in the chapter 17 verse, also talking about the Elijah coming, (the transformation vision on the mountain), that largely up to this point by bible scholars has been an easier conversation to just say the transformation is ‘contributable’ to the two historic past present day examples of Revelation witnesses of the bible (Moses and Elijah were in a vision on the mountain) and leave it at that, as something not to be further addressed. Matthew 11:13-15 highlights this even more directly, ‘For all the Prophets and the Law prophesied until John, and if you are willing to accept it, he is Elijah who is to come. He who has ears to hear, let him hear.’ When we are to avoid irreverent babble, off speculation or contrary false knowledge, sometimes the word creates obstacle even between brethren due to discernment teaching objectives and approaches. This type of understanding is part of a faith that requires moving through some unknowns. The scribes of the past had to go into further conversation on this coming Messiah who was in the genealogy of David and overlook certain common words to see an additional component into the utilization of the words Father, son, and Lord (the pharisee’s on the other hand, bypass synergistic problem solving desire – Matthew 22:41-46) and learn how to explain prophetic ink. They, through belief, had an Elijah return knowing that didn’t quite make sense upon study, yet these prophets and scribes of the past knew spiritual interpretations of how the story could and should go given the already pre-established writings before them.
I saw it unfruitful to have different bible translations growing up, that we shouldn’t need anything but a same copy no extra background debate knowledge (shouldn’t prolong life and not address prophetic recurrence), but I understand that to further engage and to give credit to the hard-earned efforts of translators, there is fruit to make it more readable and approachable to common proper living. Though to forsake this component of the prophetic call can ruin the belief in some people that would then say, ‘I therefore choose my definitions of love and life and choose to go no further but entitled disbelief’ says one with less the congregation mentality (embracing gentile instruction & work friend relationship) that connects and demands the biblical past events to be highlighted and active more than just history examples on goodness teachings in the now.
Part of my Matthew Levi effort with this all, is to set the tone for the Revelation witness mindset, how attaining to it requires a forwardness and steward responsibility (ongoing fervent prayer for now and future and always with faith & immediateness) all the while defending the themes and material within, imitating Paul as good as possible. Are there any additional meanings or suggestions associated to the disciple Matthew? Who is Levi? Is there anything extra to do with reference of the word Levite to this all? The information regarding and provided by Matthew as one of the 12 disciples is somewhat limited, but what we do know doesn’t shy us away from monetary collection exploration in a prophetic recycle of initiative. First off this disciple is referred to as Matthew in the book of Matthew, and Levi in the books of Mark and Luke as a person who decided to start following Jesus on his quest while first sitting at a tax booth. Then, he went on to throw a great feast and gathering for Jesus where many tax collectors and quote on quote ‘sinners,’ resided. See the passages below before we show a couple examples of this word Levite that I believe to be prophetically connected to this Matthew Levi character analogy of the future that begins the blending of a coalition deal collection funding effort with the man of lawlessness always a decision away.
The prophets of the past lived for us in our day, they understood time spent in the future was not only their form of additional excitement but protection against movements of organized mob tendency that would develop and otherwise stop final preaching. Don’t get me wrong, some were more old school – Ezra knew how roundabout ways of choosing God 2nd allowed the entirety of belief to become whitewashed (preserving systematic approaches), others like Daniel and Zechariah got spiritual and emotionally affected about the state of the future times; all of them contributed to their own time and the future in different ways. In our day, with no opportunity to add books to the bible, we climax to the end of the first heaven and earth that is to be burnt to a crisp and destroyed. In 1 Peter 1:12 it is written ‘It was revealed to them that they were serving not themselves but you, in the things that have now been announced to you through those who preached the good news to you by the Holy Spirit sent from heaven, things into which angels long to look.’ Not only did they carry out prophetic fulfillment during the exciting Pentecost times, such as to pick up serpents with their hands; and if they drink any deadly poison, it will not hurt them; they will lay their hands on the sick, and they will recover – not to mention speaking in new tongues and raising the dead to life as prophetic fulfillment completed almost immediately on the spot, but they had additional requirement to speak out future direction to a time ‘far or near off,’ regarding the day of gloom and darkness and thick clouds known to them as the day of the Lord.
Paul would have said to himself, could it be in my lifetime – the return of Christ? Yes, it could be he would respond. Regardless, the work before me says the appointed time is right now for building the early church. Thus saying ‘the time is short,’ the ‘last hour is at hand,’ is the only prophetic textual linguistic way to give communication in a responsible manner to the future – or else the 2nd generation from that time becomes more lackadaisical than the 3rd & then possibly 4th, as we no longer feel the urgency of the night manager. Similar to keeping the sackcloth pressure, to prophesy vision and future for 3.5 years even if it’s 10 year before it’s all accumulated into God’s timing.
Paul said things directly to a future time, that he interpreted could be days, years, or generations out from his life. What did he say through his reasoning? He said, create a modern vision (while focused on his current time objectives). He had just revealed a new mystery of the gospel, that the gentiles are fellow heirs and he undoubtedly was aware of the gospel being preached to the ends of the earth before the coming (the ends of the earth shall likely grow across the sea and the four corners of the earth we’re fully defined or explored); so continue the prophetic word kept in check by its limits and restrictions. Yet did he not see out further than his time is short appointed time attitude? He did see out further. How so? To start with we could use 1 Corinthians 1:20 ‘Where is the one who is wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age?’ Aware of prophetic interpretation himself, though this verse egging on the call into a future cooperation, we interpret his revealing’s further when saying two different times in Corinthians ‘imitate me,’ that meant not only imitate him through conduct in Christ, but through the acceptance of the call of apostlehood and prophetic decisions of our own age that would be rationalized by capabilities of the modern up to speed mind. Paul was not shy to bring out future prophetic calls and allowances of interpretation in this regard, to distinctly include the practices entirety.
1 Timothy 1:18 ‘This charge I entrust to you, Timothy, my child, in accordance with the prophecies previously made about you, that by them you may wage the good warfare, holding faith and a good conscience.” Timothy, who wasn’t John the Baptist referencing Isaiah about himself, was deemed reliable in his interpretation to fulfill prophetic faith through his grandmother, his own study, and Paul’s leadership affirmation. Paul recognized him as a true servant, and even more than that, as a prophetic character living it out as a soldier in Christ. Yet are we so quick, in the modern age, to rule out any resurface of this biblical process? Before I delve further into ‘Matthew Levi’ (which is a double name third person usage of money abstract allowance) concerning this one solution source of modern prophetic update prior to the end, I’ll further work to generalize the Elijah Revelation witness interpretation that supports this exploration and execution. Why underline ‘entrust’ as well? Mutually exclusive or not - not to peg my compounding rationalization style of determinacy - I underlined ‘entrust’ as well because of 1 Timothy 6:20 (whether directly connected or not to the first chapter prophetic reference isn’t the determining factor to talk about) that says ‘O Timothy, guard the deposit entrusted to you’ which also used the word entrust. I believe a safe interpretation would that, given the details of the man of lawlessness having access to riches, to a collection teaching of giving being associated to the restrictions of the Mark of the Beast, along with prophetic initiative decision making that has terms to what we can do or not - what is allowed or should be addressed – that in this prophetic belief, someone in the modern age as a CFO working with the church treasury formation will be entrusted to see this through, via in what we now call in the modern age a ‘company.’
Is Matthew Levi or the CFO required to represent the branches of the Romans Olive Tree prophecy as prophets of the two witnesses out of Revelations 11 initially prophetically manifested through Zechariah 4? Yes in the leadership approach acceptance. Yes in the taking on of the prophet role. But how many people also have to take on future callings that require effort to get there by additional upfront belief in it as well? A president may believe in his presidency before it occurs later on in his life, so also can there always be people with future thought and effort (as long as we’re all on the same team) about being the end time prophets of the Lord. I personally don’t care, don’t really like the total scenario, just need someone (and others) to step up with this enough to know we’re all similar or what I need to do to further catch up.
Is role of prophet glamour? It hasn’t been in the past, though I’m sure it had some excitement connected to it in those times more than now. Jesus was rejected by his own, John had people do to him as they pleased, Elijah was in the same nature as us, and in the last times no one needs to be taught love for we all know God in us through the second commandment. As continually said before, ‘the law written on stone is now surpassed by the written law on our new hearts of not flesh but spirit.’ It’s a role that is a common job, with a few hyped alterations into gravity reality (sparse miracle) that doesn’t satisfy life living. Jeremiah worked for decades being recognized lightly and dismissed along the way, Paul took decades to get people to further accept the new faith often waiting on letter and voyage, Elijah only did a few miracles a handful of times, and all of them couldn’t get mass verification (thus it was too absurd for a common recognition from the masses to believe outside of everyday living). Speaking in Revelation 11 witness language in the modern times, even with water to blood, draught, or curses that need not be admitted or rationalized, false media can always change material (and or deny IP or broadcasting reach) not to mention disbelief can always create enough comfort in others. Global warming and draughts is no new thing! Water can look like blood or be dyed! People have misfortune, curses and fairy tales aren’t real! It’s good to remind ourselves, who are we all but dust to God, the verse that says ‘what is man that you God are mindful of us?’ Yet being created in His image we are beloved if we follow the code, and God’s size diminishes our differences as He need not show partiality. He even defines hate as a goodbye word to prolonged inefficient people vessels (to those who don’t follow the code).
We’re all blessed differently with irrevocable gifts that require we find our own rhythm’s. The unsurpassable glory of heaven has variances of silver, gold, & angels (though a gold heart surpasses a silver discernment). The glory of hell (regarding our spiritual being bodies) includes a worm that doesn’t rot. Life itself is dealing with time and needs, a Christian should be content to live in their minds and spirit and not the vanity of additional false needs or titles. Not all people read well, not all people interpret well, not all people can move forward with further life objectives, but are grounded (or hindered) to stay sound executing in their daily lives of integrity. These people are unaware of opponent methodology that people can actually be serpents when you think they are clothed in sheep’s clothing dialoging properly with you. A person could be a false prophecy ‘I am he,’ and not learn prophetic additional memory as an opponent already self-deemed as condemned representing a hardened disbeliever conditioned to fear hell not, aware of the predestined grave (said in a human retrospective finger pointing kind of way) of the not-so-righteous God who created condemnation and evil into the story in the first place.
A Muslim that can ‘spiritually kill’ a Christian – that Muhammad made an awareness of, could be the antagonist who you may at times side with. Thus a person in authority (Muslim killer or not) can conveniently side with shared outlooks of all ages and differences of people, only to then slander, steal, lie & twist allegiance, give false honor as a means for their advantage, to feel entitled within themselves that controlled manipulation & handling is part of a task (verse just being a mere creature of instinct) as the ‘I am he’ god amongst gods or a star of image super personality person of power that wins by stomping and trampling nemeses. The bible talks of a future time when not only the gospel grows as the largest plant tree in the garden, but the antichrist movement also grows and creates their own objectives to ‘desolate the totality of the church practice.’ To the opponents, the victory is to make the bible history, pegged as common assembly, to make it regular repetitive practice less grandeur and complete than the varying agnostic afterlife beliefs (also a speculation they would say) as the smarter victors more wise in this age and the what could be age to come. Some opponents understand prophetic interpretation (even to role themselves into ‘I am he’ mindsets to gain the best thoughts – even if to slay or gain further miracle fig tree wither) and sit back and see all those things written ages ago while continually watching and or remembering the small and great Christians still using first information and unresolv∙ing responses; now the practice is but nice worship and and…and fizz! Some opponents are creatures of instinct, some are Baal prophets.
Why did John the Baptist say when asked, that he himself is not Elijah, yet Jesus said John was Elijah to come? To interpret a recurrence within a process of biblical prophet agenda. No, says John, I am not literally Elijah - we do not reincarnate, I’m in my own mind. Though, he would continue, I am associated to this verse out of Isaiah saying I am ‘he from the wilderness to make straight the path to Jesus’s ministry.’ This understanding means we can’t look around for everyone other than the people around you for a prophet figurehead, rather that it takes time and effort and without these lyrical inklings, the call may never have been further developed. Let’s take a quick look at Matthew 17 verses 10 through 13. ‘And the disciples asked him, “Then why do the scribes say that first Elijah must come?” He answered, “Elijah does come, and he will restore all things. But I tell you that Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him, but did to him whatever they pleased. So also the Son of Man will certainly suffer at their hands.” Then the disciples understood that he was speaking to them of John the Baptist.’
New information isn’t always safe information and an inclination is to cut off the material from unnecessary speculation or scrutiny. Rather in the chapter 17 verse, also talking about the Elijah coming, (the transformation vision on the mountain), that largely up to this point by bible scholars has been an easier conversation to just say the transformation is ‘contributable’ to the two historic past present day examples of Revelation witnesses of the bible (Moses and Elijah were in a vision on the mountain) and leave it at that, as something not to be further addressed. Matthew 11:13-15 highlights this even more directly, ‘For all the Prophets and the Law prophesied until John, and if you are willing to accept it, he is Elijah who is to come. He who has ears to hear, let him hear.’ When we are to avoid irreverent babble, off speculation or contrary false knowledge, sometimes the word creates obstacle even between brethren due to discernment teaching objectives and approaches. This type of understanding is part of a faith that requires moving through some unknowns. The scribes of the past had to go into further conversation on this coming Messiah who was in the genealogy of David and overlook certain common words to see an additional component into the utilization of the words Father, son, and Lord (the pharisee’s on the other hand, bypass synergistic problem solving desire – Matthew 22:41-46) and learn how to explain prophetic ink. They, through belief, had an Elijah return knowing that didn’t quite make sense upon study, yet these prophets and scribes of the past knew spiritual interpretations of how the story could and should go given the already pre-established writings before them.
I saw it unfruitful to have different bible translations growing up, that we shouldn’t need anything but a same copy no extra background debate knowledge (shouldn’t prolong life and not address prophetic recurrence), but I understand that to further engage and to give credit to the hard-earned efforts of translators, there is fruit to make it more readable and approachable to common proper living. Though to forsake this component of the prophetic call can ruin the belief in some people that would then say, ‘I therefore choose my definitions of love and life and choose to go no further but entitled disbelief’ says one with less the congregation mentality (embracing gentile instruction & work friend relationship) that connects and demands the biblical past events to be highlighted and active more than just history examples on goodness teachings in the now.
Part of my Matthew Levi effort with this all, is to set the tone for the Revelation witness mindset, how attaining to it requires a forwardness and steward responsibility (ongoing fervent prayer for now and future and always with faith & immediateness) all the while defending the themes and material within, imitating Paul as good as possible. Are there any additional meanings or suggestions associated to the disciple Matthew? Who is Levi? Is there anything extra to do with reference of the word Levite to this all? The information regarding and provided by Matthew as one of the 12 disciples is somewhat limited, but what we do know doesn’t shy us away from monetary collection exploration in a prophetic recycle of initiative. First off this disciple is referred to as Matthew in the book of Matthew, and Levi in the books of Mark and Luke as a person who decided to start following Jesus on his quest while first sitting at a tax booth. Then, he went on to throw a great feast and gathering for Jesus where many tax collectors and quote on quote ‘sinners,’ resided. See the passages below before we show a couple examples of this word Levite that I believe to be prophetically connected to this Matthew Levi character analogy of the future that begins the blending of a coalition deal collection funding effort with the man of lawlessness always a decision away.
|
|
|
Might I remind you again, part of this proposition prophecy test effort, is to properly reveal ‘the man of lawlessness,’ who’s written of in Daniel ‘as one who runs off with the gods and treasures of Egypt,’ and one who ‘proclaims himself over God and other gods of the earth,’ with some sort of entitlement to do so. If his party can take hosting privilege from holy covenant efforts, can make it a dedicated effort to trample upon gospel knowledge, to proactively not allow a sanctuary to be in its rightful modern place, being day in and day out on a mission to ‘shatter the power of the holy people,’ then there is some connection of this prophetic foretelling to a common modern day collection effort being done through an honest modern day Levitical effort reemergence. Part of the Revelation witness effort is to shut the skies in Egypt as the starting point. It blends a resolve into the equation, that believers aren’t contrarily wanting a form of destruction worse living to occur on behalf of an angry mercy seeking wrath filled God. There is, to some degree with this, an accommodating resolve completely backed by passages in the bible in every which way, that lead to this decision; being fully aware of the threat of prophetic foretelling’s (often disdained by majorities of people) this lightens the prayer effort for drought which to some could almost be construed as a desire for ‘repaying an evil for evil’ being done in contrary fashion to biblical statute and thus something an opponent could strive against, yet shared interpretation out of Zechariah allows Egypt to be part of a decision where highlighted and accessible money helps ease the material (not to mention modern technology and information and pre-established climate awareness). Anyway, back to the limited information we have regarding Matthew and Levi / Levites…
Study task, use a highlighter (or print and underline) all details about the Levites out of 2 Chronicles Chapter 34: 8-32.
2 Chronicles Chapter 35: 20-27 (diplomatic prophetic strategy)
2 Chronicles Chapter 36: 17-21 (false prophecy coalition)
Now regarding Levi and prophecy test, lets continue finalizing this Elijah knowing that Jesus doesn't shy away from - especially at the end of the book of John. To conclude, what is it that I am getting at about action and prophetic interpretation through this all? Who is Elijah alive from the grave, who is John the Baptist, what does that mean or imply? Why did they ask, ‘is this the prophet?’ How does this relate to the disciple whom ‘Jesus loved’ at the end of John? Why did they wonder if he wouldn’t die, yet Jesus didn’t confirm that this disciple would not die but said ‘If it is my will that he remain until I come, what is that to you?’
Trial and error is part of a grace we live out, not all refrain in sacrifice to the same extent; yes teaching with a forward teaching that says ‘see and attain to be anointed’ isn’t always sound given execution, interpretation, and obtaining and the processing of a large amount of connected material, objectives, and teachings throughout our lives. Whether in our youth development years, or former ignorance segments in our lives (especially disbelief as a wild vine branch) or the new believer variances of conceit being puffed in the clouds (I’ve thought it all before, maybe better, maybe more dream angelic inspired) there is some soundness to not teach us to attain to prophet of the Lord – especially given we don’t want to create a worse representation of modern day faith, to be yoked to false prophet ‘I am he’s,’ contributing to false prophecy playing out, that would take away from congregation fruit and zeal.
Nevertheless, from the totality of all things part of this faith, we can’t shy away or misaddress the fact that enough coincidences and revealing’s within the word indicate that this effort must be made more of, especially in the right season of time. Jesus said ‘no sign will be given to his own generation,’ except, 'as Jonah was in the belly of the whale for 3 days and nights, so will the son of man be in the heart of the earth before rising.’ Revelations 11 regarding the two witnesses, who have objectives like Elijah did in the past ‘they have the power to shut the sky, that no rain may fall during the days (3.5 years) of their prophesying,’ have actual objectives to carry out. In this age it must become addressed and carried out. Remember the verse from James 4:16-18 regarding Elijah ‘..The prayer of a righteous person has great power as it is working. Elijah was a man with a nature like ours, and he prayed fervently that it might not rain, and for three years and six months it did not rain on the earth. Then he prayed again, and heaven gave rain, and the earth bore its fruit.’ This task directly pertains to the total objective in the modern age in multiple ways.
Revelations, that highlights a recurring time duration as part of an execution objective, phrases 42 months, 1,260 days, 3.5 years, three years and six months, also connects a short duration of ‘3 days and 3 nights’ or in the last book in the bible ‘3.5 days’ to chapter 11 verse 11 (after the witnesses are killed) saying, ‘But after the three and a half days a breath of life from God entered them, and they stood up on their feet, and great fear fell on those who saw them.’ In this case, the objective of the modern era – unlike Jesus’s timeframe when the only sign to all those who didn’t see his miracles or good works was the knowledge of his resurrection from the cross after 3 days and nights – is to highlight the end time signs communicated to us via the future now technology mediums. Yet to stir us to the total belief comprehension regarding the writings from ages ago, there is yet again a 3-and-a-half-day scenario to create a further faith-based inquiry in us. That, in this age, should occur as part of a large collective effort in the modern age of people all in sync with all of what needs to occur.
Study task, use a highlighter (or print and underline) all details about the Levites out of 2 Chronicles Chapter 34: 8-32.
- Are they project managers?
- Do they have association to entertainment, the art of different peoples mastery’s?
- Do they collect money? Do they have association more to taxation?
- What’s the difference of a priest, a Levite and a Levitical priest and the correlations?
- When they found this ‘book of the law,’ more about Moses and spiritual discernment – was reference of the Psalms part of it? (Relevant to spark photo)
- Did they play a part in rebuilding the ‘house of the LORD?’ How so (in all ways)?
- What can a Levite be referred to as (various job titles)?
2 Chronicles Chapter 35: 20-27 (diplomatic prophetic strategy)
- Knowing Josiah did good in the sight of the Lord as king for 31 years, how does this passage define him and king Neco of Egypt? Explain further aware Neco went on his way.
- How is there a prophetic cooperation though this knowledge that connects to drought in Egypt?
- If the outer courts can’t be measured, and the Euphrates is located near this increased practice area of Islam – then will that land be dry too?
2 Chronicles Chapter 36: 17-21 (false prophecy coalition)
- The Chaldeans with pomp and might are spoken of where else in the bible? What kind of enemy are they?
- If you are practicing the Jewish Christianity, you strive to repay evil for good and to see the will complete through true prophecy. Yet the Chaledeans allow life terms to be created through the bible as something they are aware of as prophetic misguides practicing false prophecy. How does, by the end of this designated section out of Chapter 36, it prove true the word of the Lord through the mouth of Jeremiah the prophet that the 70 years decreed would come to pass without a further resistance? Explain the coalition understanding and how this pertains to the prophetic?
Now regarding Levi and prophecy test, lets continue finalizing this Elijah knowing that Jesus doesn't shy away from - especially at the end of the book of John. To conclude, what is it that I am getting at about action and prophetic interpretation through this all? Who is Elijah alive from the grave, who is John the Baptist, what does that mean or imply? Why did they ask, ‘is this the prophet?’ How does this relate to the disciple whom ‘Jesus loved’ at the end of John? Why did they wonder if he wouldn’t die, yet Jesus didn’t confirm that this disciple would not die but said ‘If it is my will that he remain until I come, what is that to you?’
Trial and error is part of a grace we live out, not all refrain in sacrifice to the same extent; yes teaching with a forward teaching that says ‘see and attain to be anointed’ isn’t always sound given execution, interpretation, and obtaining and the processing of a large amount of connected material, objectives, and teachings throughout our lives. Whether in our youth development years, or former ignorance segments in our lives (especially disbelief as a wild vine branch) or the new believer variances of conceit being puffed in the clouds (I’ve thought it all before, maybe better, maybe more dream angelic inspired) there is some soundness to not teach us to attain to prophet of the Lord – especially given we don’t want to create a worse representation of modern day faith, to be yoked to false prophet ‘I am he’s,’ contributing to false prophecy playing out, that would take away from congregation fruit and zeal.
Nevertheless, from the totality of all things part of this faith, we can’t shy away or misaddress the fact that enough coincidences and revealing’s within the word indicate that this effort must be made more of, especially in the right season of time. Jesus said ‘no sign will be given to his own generation,’ except, 'as Jonah was in the belly of the whale for 3 days and nights, so will the son of man be in the heart of the earth before rising.’ Revelations 11 regarding the two witnesses, who have objectives like Elijah did in the past ‘they have the power to shut the sky, that no rain may fall during the days (3.5 years) of their prophesying,’ have actual objectives to carry out. In this age it must become addressed and carried out. Remember the verse from James 4:16-18 regarding Elijah ‘..The prayer of a righteous person has great power as it is working. Elijah was a man with a nature like ours, and he prayed fervently that it might not rain, and for three years and six months it did not rain on the earth. Then he prayed again, and heaven gave rain, and the earth bore its fruit.’ This task directly pertains to the total objective in the modern age in multiple ways.
Revelations, that highlights a recurring time duration as part of an execution objective, phrases 42 months, 1,260 days, 3.5 years, three years and six months, also connects a short duration of ‘3 days and 3 nights’ or in the last book in the bible ‘3.5 days’ to chapter 11 verse 11 (after the witnesses are killed) saying, ‘But after the three and a half days a breath of life from God entered them, and they stood up on their feet, and great fear fell on those who saw them.’ In this case, the objective of the modern era – unlike Jesus’s timeframe when the only sign to all those who didn’t see his miracles or good works was the knowledge of his resurrection from the cross after 3 days and nights – is to highlight the end time signs communicated to us via the future now technology mediums. Yet to stir us to the total belief comprehension regarding the writings from ages ago, there is yet again a 3-and-a-half-day scenario to create a further faith-based inquiry in us. That, in this age, should occur as part of a large collective effort in the modern age of people all in sync with all of what needs to occur.
|
If false prophecy (AoD) allows thwarting, the only come to pass from my mouth is Jesus will return in the test window.
|
|
Will it come to pass to get the million in sync with prophetic fulfillment? It depends on the Abomination of Desolation, the effort set up by antichrists to make desolate the call of Christ in the modern age. The knowledge created up to this point however, the symbolic teachings, even through the minds of opponents whereas this antichrist from just reading or getting a summary could dream his future access to a website with billions of dollars associated to it, could be an iota before the end – yet the only thing left is to strive to see everything done with the right balance of literal and symbolic carryout, that should include more people than in the past when waiting on letter and slow travel.
If it was Zerubbabel and Joshua creating a cornerstone and the Olive Tree Analogy Romans Revelation prophecy out of Zechariah, it was also Peter and Paul (or and with the previously prophesied Timothy the servant capable & interchangeable in the analogy learning), so the question we must ask is why did Jesus have to say ‘the one whom I loved’ in addition to the already set forth knowledge that he loved all the disciples – so why say that? To create action in the future. This disciple saw for Jesus; Peter played with Jesus who yet had to say 'get behind me Satan,' and 'Peter I had to pray that Satan may not sift you.' Peter trusted his own authority yet could forget the angelic realm can change immediate intuition discernment. This other disciple may have come to a complete faith trusting Jesus as one faster to accept things like a child, as one treated smaller and least in the equation of the cup, likely to go through various further difficulties of life and obligation. We know this disciple, whom he loved, leaned over at the table and said to Jesus ‘is this the one who will betray you’ (speaking of Judas Iscariot) as the other disciples, quite possibly, didn’t rationalize this to a further extent. Paul created his own entitlement speculation from Philippians 3:5 saying works and consecration matter, and the sons of thunder cup from Matthew 20:20-23 furthered the inquiry regarding additional title - this disciple 'whom Jesus loved,' part of the 12 disciples crew and quite possibly the future return, may have had a scrutinized resume and lacking sins, yet sat capable in the corner as his true right-hand man.
We know that this disciple also ‘ran to the tomb faster than Peter.’ If Peter didn't have spy-chain-authority working over the others in the group with additional non-disclosed communications with Jesus (in that Peter denied three times correctly with forefront knowledge and communication with Jesus prior) not intended for reader awareness, then there is something to quick discernment regarding intuition that relates more with Jesus spending eternal time. Yes its possible that they first documented, for prophetic purposes, the creation of the upfront reaction where Peter first said 'preposterous, I’d die for you! I'd never betray you!' Yet Jesus gave him the look afterwards saying so you want prison for life after they capture you – can you go against my prophetic mouth anyway after I just said this? Peter reacts at those denial moments with the proper awareness upfront, then colluded and handled by the spiritual realm to ensure fulfillment in those moments he carried out fulfillment. Not even preposterous to say he was the leader over the other disciple, as Peter had learned his style and personality with Jesus and his responses. This disciple whom he loved could likely be more aware of the stray 1 sheep and what that entails verse the 99 religious sheep that don’t create as much requirement or quick thinking given they believe cultivated which doesn't give as much credit to why people choose to disbelieve, even against condemnation and hell threats. Around sinners against gospel theme, such as what Levi surrounded himself with, it creates extra reaction requirement so this person literally faster than Peter may have had more of the dynamic people conversationalist inherent gift of no judgement clay mold predestination trust – as Jesus and likely this disciple too, got time with sinners and tax collectors as a role of additional total focus. Who is who in this isn’t the point, yes this disciple could be reference of one of the Revelation witnesses, could be the initiator of the Daniel vision (to even allow an accorded exclusive funding effort to manifest as a Levi reemergence via promissory early withdraw tax pledging), even the one beloved by women (who the man of lawlessness doesn’t listen oblige to), or merely a teaching to initiate the true dedicated Elijah servant of the modern times. Lest the material not be weighted in accordance to the totality of the word!
If it was Zerubbabel and Joshua creating a cornerstone and the Olive Tree Analogy Romans Revelation prophecy out of Zechariah, it was also Peter and Paul (or and with the previously prophesied Timothy the servant capable & interchangeable in the analogy learning), so the question we must ask is why did Jesus have to say ‘the one whom I loved’ in addition to the already set forth knowledge that he loved all the disciples – so why say that? To create action in the future. This disciple saw for Jesus; Peter played with Jesus who yet had to say 'get behind me Satan,' and 'Peter I had to pray that Satan may not sift you.' Peter trusted his own authority yet could forget the angelic realm can change immediate intuition discernment. This other disciple may have come to a complete faith trusting Jesus as one faster to accept things like a child, as one treated smaller and least in the equation of the cup, likely to go through various further difficulties of life and obligation. We know this disciple, whom he loved, leaned over at the table and said to Jesus ‘is this the one who will betray you’ (speaking of Judas Iscariot) as the other disciples, quite possibly, didn’t rationalize this to a further extent. Paul created his own entitlement speculation from Philippians 3:5 saying works and consecration matter, and the sons of thunder cup from Matthew 20:20-23 furthered the inquiry regarding additional title - this disciple 'whom Jesus loved,' part of the 12 disciples crew and quite possibly the future return, may have had a scrutinized resume and lacking sins, yet sat capable in the corner as his true right-hand man.
We know that this disciple also ‘ran to the tomb faster than Peter.’ If Peter didn't have spy-chain-authority working over the others in the group with additional non-disclosed communications with Jesus (in that Peter denied three times correctly with forefront knowledge and communication with Jesus prior) not intended for reader awareness, then there is something to quick discernment regarding intuition that relates more with Jesus spending eternal time. Yes its possible that they first documented, for prophetic purposes, the creation of the upfront reaction where Peter first said 'preposterous, I’d die for you! I'd never betray you!' Yet Jesus gave him the look afterwards saying so you want prison for life after they capture you – can you go against my prophetic mouth anyway after I just said this? Peter reacts at those denial moments with the proper awareness upfront, then colluded and handled by the spiritual realm to ensure fulfillment in those moments he carried out fulfillment. Not even preposterous to say he was the leader over the other disciple, as Peter had learned his style and personality with Jesus and his responses. This disciple whom he loved could likely be more aware of the stray 1 sheep and what that entails verse the 99 religious sheep that don’t create as much requirement or quick thinking given they believe cultivated which doesn't give as much credit to why people choose to disbelieve, even against condemnation and hell threats. Around sinners against gospel theme, such as what Levi surrounded himself with, it creates extra reaction requirement so this person literally faster than Peter may have had more of the dynamic people conversationalist inherent gift of no judgement clay mold predestination trust – as Jesus and likely this disciple too, got time with sinners and tax collectors as a role of additional total focus. Who is who in this isn’t the point, yes this disciple could be reference of one of the Revelation witnesses, could be the initiator of the Daniel vision (to even allow an accorded exclusive funding effort to manifest as a Levi reemergence via promissory early withdraw tax pledging), even the one beloved by women (who the man of lawlessness doesn’t listen oblige to), or merely a teaching to initiate the true dedicated Elijah servant of the modern times. Lest the material not be weighted in accordance to the totality of the word!
