This is no knew thing in the bible, people take calls and go through the process of reasoning out their faith through testing and continual effort. If they cooperated together for a collection effort in Acts, if they continually had to physically build up the temple in Jerusalem, or the foundation of Zion 'that at times was desolate or trampled upon, with contrary practice' than this type of thought is still contextually healthy. The 'let the reader understand' reference, or 'to those with ears,' means you who are called must problem solve additionally and be forced (with no option to shrink back) to proclaim all that needs to be addressed by connecting material and process. We have this time-frame we are in to accomplish feats of past prophetic agenda, to heal interpretation of the decisions of those times, to magnify directions given to the future, to consciously be better spared from the last hour, to not be ‘the desolate camp,’ with no sanctuary restored options for the modern Daniel vision update that dot’s the i’ and crosses the t’s for gospel gentile fulfillment to the ends of the earth.
The prophets of the past lived for us in our day, they understood time spent in the future was not only their form of additional excitement but protection against movements of organized mob tendency that would develop and otherwise stop final preaching. Don’t get me wrong, some were more old school – Ezra knew how roundabout ways of choosing God 2nd allowed the entirety of belief to become whitewashed (preserving systematic approaches), others like Daniel and Zechariah got spiritual and emotionally affected about the state of the future times; all of them contributed to their own time and the future in different ways. In our day, with no opportunity to add books to the bible, we climax to the end of the first heaven and earth that is to be burnt to a crisp and destroyed. In 1 Peter 1:12 it is written ‘It was revealed to them that they were serving not themselves but you, in the things that have now been announced to you through those who preached the good news to you by the Holy Spirit sent from heaven, things into which angels long to look.’ Not only did they carry out prophetic fulfillment during the exciting Pentecost times, such as to pick up serpents with their hands; and if they drink any deadly poison, it will not hurt them; they will lay their hands on the sick, and they will recover – not to mention speaking in new tongues and raising the dead to life as prophetic fulfillment completed almost immediately on the spot, but they had additional requirement to speak out future direction to a time ‘far or near off,’ regarding the day of gloom and darkness and thick clouds known to them as the day of the Lord.
Paul would have said to himself, could it be in my lifetime – the return of Christ? Yes, it could be he would respond. Regardless, the work before me says the appointed time is right now for building the early church. Thus saying ‘the time is short,’ the ‘last hour is at hand,’ is the only prophetic textual linguistic way to give communication in a responsible manner to the future – or else the 2nd generation from that time becomes more lackadaisical than the 3rd & then possibly 4th, as we no longer feel the urgency of the night manager. Similar to keeping the sackcloth pressure, to prophesy vision and future for 3.5 years even if it’s 10 year before it’s all accumulated into God’s timing.
Paul said things directly to a future time, that he interpreted could be days, years, or generations out from his life. What did he say through his reasoning? He said, create a modern vision (while focused on his current time objectives). He had just revealed a new mystery of the gospel, that the gentiles are fellow heirs and he undoubtedly was aware of the gospel being preached to the ends of the earth before the coming (the ends of the earth shall likely grow across the sea and the four corners of the earth we’re fully defined or explored); so continue the prophetic word kept in check by its limits and restrictions. Yet did he not see out further than his time is short appointed time attitude? He did see out further. How so? To start with we could use 1 Corinthians 1:20 ‘Where is the one who is wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age?’ Aware of prophetic interpretation himself, though this verse egging on the call into a future cooperation, we interpret his revealing’s further when saying two different times in Corinthians ‘imitate me,’ that meant not only imitate him through conduct in Christ, but through the acceptance of the call of apostlehood and prophetic decisions of our own age that would be rationalized by capabilities of the modern up to speed mind. Paul was not shy to bring out future prophetic calls and allowances of interpretation in this regard, to distinctly include the practices entirety.
1 Timothy 1:18 ‘This charge I entrust to you, Timothy, my child, in accordance with the prophecies previously made about you, that by them you may wage the good warfare, holding faith and a good conscience.” Timothy, who wasn’t John the Baptist referencing Isaiah about himself, was deemed reliable in his interpretation to fulfill prophetic faith through his grandmother, his own study, and Paul’s leadership affirmation. Paul recognized him as a true servant, and even more than that, as a prophetic character living it out as a soldier in Christ. Yet are we so quick, in the modern age, to rule out any resurface of this biblical process? Before I delve further into ‘Matthew Levi’ (which is a double name third person usage of money abstract allowance) concerning this one solution source of modern prophetic update prior to the end, I’ll further work to generalize the Elijah Revelation witness interpretation that supports this exploration and execution. Why underline ‘entrust’ as well? Mutually exclusive or not - not to peg my compounding rationalization style of determinacy - I underlined ‘entrust’ as well because of 1 Timothy 6:20 (whether directly connected or not to the first chapter prophetic reference isn’t the determining factor to talk about) that says ‘O Timothy, guard the deposit entrusted to you’ which also used the word entrust. I believe a safe interpretation would that, given the details of the man of lawlessness having access to riches, to a collection teaching of giving being associated to the restrictions of the Mark of the Beast, along with prophetic initiative decision making that has terms to what we can do or not - what is allowed or should be addressed – that in this prophetic belief, someone in the modern age as a CFO working with the church treasury formation will be entrusted to see this through, via in what we now call in the modern age a ‘company.’
Is Matthew Levi or the CFO required to represent the branches of the Romans Olive Tree prophecy as prophets of the two witnesses out of Revelations 11 initially prophetically manifested through Zechariah 4? Yes in the leadership approach acceptance. Yes in the taking on of the prophet role. But how many people also have to take on future callings that require effort to get there by additional upfront belief in it as well? A president may believe in his presidency before it occurs later on in his life, so also can there always be people with future thought and effort (as long as we’re all on the same team) about being the end time prophets of the Lord. I personally don’t care, don’t really like the total scenario, just need someone (and others) to step up with this enough to know we’re all similar or what I need to do to further catch up.
Is role of prophet glamour? It hasn’t been in the past, though I’m sure it had some excitement connected to it in those times more than now. Jesus was rejected by his own, John had people do to him as they pleased, Elijah was in the same nature as us, and in the last times no one needs to be taught love for we all know God in us through the second commandment. As continually said before, ‘the law written on stone is now surpassed by the written law on our new hearts of not flesh but spirit.’ It’s a role that is a common job, with a few hyped alterations into gravity reality (sparse miracle) that doesn’t satisfy life living. Jeremiah worked for decades being recognized lightly and dismissed along the way, Paul took decades to get people to further accept the new faith often waiting on letter and voyage, Elijah only did a few miracles a handful of times, and all of them couldn’t get mass verification (thus it was too absurd for a common recognition from the masses to believe outside of everyday living). Speaking in Revelation 11 witness language in the modern times, even with water to blood, draught, or curses that need not be admitted or rationalized, false media can always change material (and or deny IP or broadcasting reach) not to mention disbelief can always create enough comfort in others. Global warming and draughts is no new thing! Water can look like blood or be dyed! People have misfortune, curses and fairy tales aren’t real! It’s good to remind ourselves, who are we all but dust to God, the verse that says ‘what is man that you God are mindful of us?’ Yet being created in His image we are beloved if we follow the code, and God’s size diminishes our differences as He need not show partiality. He even defines hate as a goodbye word to prolonged inefficient people vessels (to those who don’t follow the code).
We’re all blessed differently with irrevocable gifts that require we find our own rhythm’s. The unsurpassable glory of heaven has variances of silver, gold, & angels (though a gold heart surpasses a silver discernment). The glory of hell (regarding our spiritual being bodies) includes a worm that doesn’t rot. Life itself is dealing with time and needs, a Christian should be content to live in their minds and spirit and not the vanity of additional false needs or titles. Not all people read well, not all people interpret well, not all people can move forward with further life objectives, but are grounded (or hindered) to stay sound executing in their daily lives of integrity. These people are unaware of opponent methodology that people can actually be serpents when you think they are clothed in sheep’s clothing dialoging properly with you. A person could be a false prophecy ‘I am he,’ and not learn prophetic additional memory as an opponent already self-deemed as condemned representing a hardened disbeliever conditioned to fear hell not, aware of the predestined grave (said in a human retrospective finger pointing kind of way) of the not-so-righteous God who created condemnation and evil into the story in the first place.
A Muslim that can ‘spiritually kill’ a Christian – that Muhammad made an awareness of, could be the antagonist who you may at times side with. Thus a person in authority (Muslim killer or not) can conveniently side with shared outlooks of all ages and differences of people, only to then slander, steal, lie & twist allegiance, give false honor as a means for their advantage, to feel entitled within themselves that controlled manipulation & handling is part of a task (verse just being a mere creature of instinct) as the ‘I am he’ god amongst gods or a star of image super personality person of power that wins by stomping and trampling nemeses. The bible talks of a future time when not only the gospel grows as the largest plant tree in the garden, but the antichrist movement also grows and creates their own objectives to ‘desolate the totality of the church practice.’ To the opponents, the victory is to make the bible history, pegged as common assembly, to make it regular repetitive practice less grandeur and complete than the varying agnostic afterlife beliefs (also a speculation they would say) as the smarter victors more wise in this age and the what could be age to come. Some opponents understand prophetic interpretation (even to role themselves into ‘I am he’ mindsets to gain the best thoughts – even if to slay or gain further miracle fig tree wither) and sit back and see all those things written ages ago while continually watching and or remembering the small and great Christians still using first information and unresolv∙ing responses; now the practice is but nice worship and and…and fizz! Some opponents are creatures of instinct, some are Baal prophets.
Why did John the Baptist say when asked, that he himself is not Elijah, yet Jesus said John was Elijah to come? To interpret a recurrence within a process of biblical prophet agenda. No, says John, I am not literally Elijah - we do not reincarnate, I’m in my own mind. Though, he would continue, I am associated to this verse out of Isaiah saying I am ‘he from the wilderness to make straight the path to Jesus’s ministry.’ This understanding means we can’t look around for everyone other than the people around you for a prophet figurehead, rather that it takes time and effort and without these lyrical inklings, the call may never have been further developed. Let’s take a quick look at Matthew 17 verses 10 through 13. ‘And the disciples asked him, “Then why do the scribes say that first Elijah must come?” He answered, “Elijah does come, and he will restore all things. But I tell you that Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him, but did to him whatever they pleased. So also the Son of Man will certainly suffer at their hands.” Then the disciples understood that he was speaking to them of John the Baptist.’
New information isn’t always safe information and an inclination is to cut off the material from unnecessary speculation or scrutiny. Rather in the chapter 17 verse, also talking about the Elijah coming, (the transformation vision on the mountain), that largely up to this point by bible scholars has been an easier conversation to just say the transformation is ‘contributable’ to the two historic past present day examples of Revelation witnesses of the bible (Moses and Elijah were in a vision on the mountain) and leave it at that, as something not to be further addressed. Matthew 11:13-15 highlights this even more directly, ‘For all the Prophets and the Law prophesied until John, and if you are willing to accept it, he is Elijah who is to come. He who has ears to hear, let him hear.’ When we are to avoid irreverent babble, off speculation or contrary false knowledge, sometimes the word creates obstacle even between brethren due to discernment teaching objectives and approaches. This type of understanding is part of a faith that requires moving through some unknowns. The scribes of the past had to go into further conversation on this coming Messiah who was in the genealogy of David and overlook certain common words to see an additional component into the utilization of the words Father, son, and Lord (the pharisee’s on the other hand, bypass synergistic problem solving desire – Matthew 22:41-46) and learn how to explain prophetic ink. They, through belief, had an Elijah return knowing that didn’t quite make sense upon study, yet these prophets and scribes of the past knew spiritual interpretations of how the story could and should go given the already pre-established writings before them.
I saw it unfruitful to have different bible translations growing up, that we shouldn’t need anything but a same copy no extra background debate knowledge (shouldn’t prolong life and not address prophetic recurrence), but I understand that to further engage and to give credit to the hard-earned efforts of translators, there is fruit to make it more readable and approachable to common proper living. Though to forsake this component of the prophetic call can ruin the belief in some people that would then say, ‘I therefore choose my definitions of love and life and choose to go no further but entitled disbelief’ says one with less the congregation mentality (embracing gentile instruction & work friend relationship) that connects and demands the biblical past events to be highlighted and active more than just history examples on goodness teachings in the now.
Part of my Matthew Levi effort with this all, is to set the tone for the Revelation witness mindset, how attaining to it requires a forwardness and steward responsibility (ongoing fervent prayer for now and future and always with faith & immediateness) all the while defending the themes and material within, imitating Paul as good as possible. Are there any additional meanings or suggestions associated to the disciple Matthew? Who is Levi? Is there anything extra to do with reference of the word Levite to this all? The information regarding and provided by Matthew as one of the 12 disciples is somewhat limited, but what we do know doesn’t shy us away from monetary collection exploration in a prophetic recycle of initiative. First off this disciple is referred to as Matthew in the book of Matthew, and Levi in the books of Mark and Luke as a person who decided to start following Jesus on his quest while first sitting at a tax booth. Then, he went on to throw a great feast and gathering for Jesus where many tax collectors and quote on quote ‘sinners,’ resided. See the passages below before we show a couple examples of this word Levite that I believe to be prophetically connected to this Matthew Levi character analogy of the future that begins the blending of a coalition deal collection funding effort with the man of lawlessness always a decision away.
The prophets of the past lived for us in our day, they understood time spent in the future was not only their form of additional excitement but protection against movements of organized mob tendency that would develop and otherwise stop final preaching. Don’t get me wrong, some were more old school – Ezra knew how roundabout ways of choosing God 2nd allowed the entirety of belief to become whitewashed (preserving systematic approaches), others like Daniel and Zechariah got spiritual and emotionally affected about the state of the future times; all of them contributed to their own time and the future in different ways. In our day, with no opportunity to add books to the bible, we climax to the end of the first heaven and earth that is to be burnt to a crisp and destroyed. In 1 Peter 1:12 it is written ‘It was revealed to them that they were serving not themselves but you, in the things that have now been announced to you through those who preached the good news to you by the Holy Spirit sent from heaven, things into which angels long to look.’ Not only did they carry out prophetic fulfillment during the exciting Pentecost times, such as to pick up serpents with their hands; and if they drink any deadly poison, it will not hurt them; they will lay their hands on the sick, and they will recover – not to mention speaking in new tongues and raising the dead to life as prophetic fulfillment completed almost immediately on the spot, but they had additional requirement to speak out future direction to a time ‘far or near off,’ regarding the day of gloom and darkness and thick clouds known to them as the day of the Lord.
Paul would have said to himself, could it be in my lifetime – the return of Christ? Yes, it could be he would respond. Regardless, the work before me says the appointed time is right now for building the early church. Thus saying ‘the time is short,’ the ‘last hour is at hand,’ is the only prophetic textual linguistic way to give communication in a responsible manner to the future – or else the 2nd generation from that time becomes more lackadaisical than the 3rd & then possibly 4th, as we no longer feel the urgency of the night manager. Similar to keeping the sackcloth pressure, to prophesy vision and future for 3.5 years even if it’s 10 year before it’s all accumulated into God’s timing.
Paul said things directly to a future time, that he interpreted could be days, years, or generations out from his life. What did he say through his reasoning? He said, create a modern vision (while focused on his current time objectives). He had just revealed a new mystery of the gospel, that the gentiles are fellow heirs and he undoubtedly was aware of the gospel being preached to the ends of the earth before the coming (the ends of the earth shall likely grow across the sea and the four corners of the earth we’re fully defined or explored); so continue the prophetic word kept in check by its limits and restrictions. Yet did he not see out further than his time is short appointed time attitude? He did see out further. How so? To start with we could use 1 Corinthians 1:20 ‘Where is the one who is wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age?’ Aware of prophetic interpretation himself, though this verse egging on the call into a future cooperation, we interpret his revealing’s further when saying two different times in Corinthians ‘imitate me,’ that meant not only imitate him through conduct in Christ, but through the acceptance of the call of apostlehood and prophetic decisions of our own age that would be rationalized by capabilities of the modern up to speed mind. Paul was not shy to bring out future prophetic calls and allowances of interpretation in this regard, to distinctly include the practices entirety.
1 Timothy 1:18 ‘This charge I entrust to you, Timothy, my child, in accordance with the prophecies previously made about you, that by them you may wage the good warfare, holding faith and a good conscience.” Timothy, who wasn’t John the Baptist referencing Isaiah about himself, was deemed reliable in his interpretation to fulfill prophetic faith through his grandmother, his own study, and Paul’s leadership affirmation. Paul recognized him as a true servant, and even more than that, as a prophetic character living it out as a soldier in Christ. Yet are we so quick, in the modern age, to rule out any resurface of this biblical process? Before I delve further into ‘Matthew Levi’ (which is a double name third person usage of money abstract allowance) concerning this one solution source of modern prophetic update prior to the end, I’ll further work to generalize the Elijah Revelation witness interpretation that supports this exploration and execution. Why underline ‘entrust’ as well? Mutually exclusive or not - not to peg my compounding rationalization style of determinacy - I underlined ‘entrust’ as well because of 1 Timothy 6:20 (whether directly connected or not to the first chapter prophetic reference isn’t the determining factor to talk about) that says ‘O Timothy, guard the deposit entrusted to you’ which also used the word entrust. I believe a safe interpretation would that, given the details of the man of lawlessness having access to riches, to a collection teaching of giving being associated to the restrictions of the Mark of the Beast, along with prophetic initiative decision making that has terms to what we can do or not - what is allowed or should be addressed – that in this prophetic belief, someone in the modern age as a CFO working with the church treasury formation will be entrusted to see this through, via in what we now call in the modern age a ‘company.’
Is Matthew Levi or the CFO required to represent the branches of the Romans Olive Tree prophecy as prophets of the two witnesses out of Revelations 11 initially prophetically manifested through Zechariah 4? Yes in the leadership approach acceptance. Yes in the taking on of the prophet role. But how many people also have to take on future callings that require effort to get there by additional upfront belief in it as well? A president may believe in his presidency before it occurs later on in his life, so also can there always be people with future thought and effort (as long as we’re all on the same team) about being the end time prophets of the Lord. I personally don’t care, don’t really like the total scenario, just need someone (and others) to step up with this enough to know we’re all similar or what I need to do to further catch up.
Is role of prophet glamour? It hasn’t been in the past, though I’m sure it had some excitement connected to it in those times more than now. Jesus was rejected by his own, John had people do to him as they pleased, Elijah was in the same nature as us, and in the last times no one needs to be taught love for we all know God in us through the second commandment. As continually said before, ‘the law written on stone is now surpassed by the written law on our new hearts of not flesh but spirit.’ It’s a role that is a common job, with a few hyped alterations into gravity reality (sparse miracle) that doesn’t satisfy life living. Jeremiah worked for decades being recognized lightly and dismissed along the way, Paul took decades to get people to further accept the new faith often waiting on letter and voyage, Elijah only did a few miracles a handful of times, and all of them couldn’t get mass verification (thus it was too absurd for a common recognition from the masses to believe outside of everyday living). Speaking in Revelation 11 witness language in the modern times, even with water to blood, draught, or curses that need not be admitted or rationalized, false media can always change material (and or deny IP or broadcasting reach) not to mention disbelief can always create enough comfort in others. Global warming and draughts is no new thing! Water can look like blood or be dyed! People have misfortune, curses and fairy tales aren’t real! It’s good to remind ourselves, who are we all but dust to God, the verse that says ‘what is man that you God are mindful of us?’ Yet being created in His image we are beloved if we follow the code, and God’s size diminishes our differences as He need not show partiality. He even defines hate as a goodbye word to prolonged inefficient people vessels (to those who don’t follow the code).
We’re all blessed differently with irrevocable gifts that require we find our own rhythm’s. The unsurpassable glory of heaven has variances of silver, gold, & angels (though a gold heart surpasses a silver discernment). The glory of hell (regarding our spiritual being bodies) includes a worm that doesn’t rot. Life itself is dealing with time and needs, a Christian should be content to live in their minds and spirit and not the vanity of additional false needs or titles. Not all people read well, not all people interpret well, not all people can move forward with further life objectives, but are grounded (or hindered) to stay sound executing in their daily lives of integrity. These people are unaware of opponent methodology that people can actually be serpents when you think they are clothed in sheep’s clothing dialoging properly with you. A person could be a false prophecy ‘I am he,’ and not learn prophetic additional memory as an opponent already self-deemed as condemned representing a hardened disbeliever conditioned to fear hell not, aware of the predestined grave (said in a human retrospective finger pointing kind of way) of the not-so-righteous God who created condemnation and evil into the story in the first place.
A Muslim that can ‘spiritually kill’ a Christian – that Muhammad made an awareness of, could be the antagonist who you may at times side with. Thus a person in authority (Muslim killer or not) can conveniently side with shared outlooks of all ages and differences of people, only to then slander, steal, lie & twist allegiance, give false honor as a means for their advantage, to feel entitled within themselves that controlled manipulation & handling is part of a task (verse just being a mere creature of instinct) as the ‘I am he’ god amongst gods or a star of image super personality person of power that wins by stomping and trampling nemeses. The bible talks of a future time when not only the gospel grows as the largest plant tree in the garden, but the antichrist movement also grows and creates their own objectives to ‘desolate the totality of the church practice.’ To the opponents, the victory is to make the bible history, pegged as common assembly, to make it regular repetitive practice less grandeur and complete than the varying agnostic afterlife beliefs (also a speculation they would say) as the smarter victors more wise in this age and the what could be age to come. Some opponents understand prophetic interpretation (even to role themselves into ‘I am he’ mindsets to gain the best thoughts – even if to slay or gain further miracle fig tree wither) and sit back and see all those things written ages ago while continually watching and or remembering the small and great Christians still using first information and unresolv∙ing responses; now the practice is but nice worship and and…and fizz! Some opponents are creatures of instinct, some are Baal prophets.
Why did John the Baptist say when asked, that he himself is not Elijah, yet Jesus said John was Elijah to come? To interpret a recurrence within a process of biblical prophet agenda. No, says John, I am not literally Elijah - we do not reincarnate, I’m in my own mind. Though, he would continue, I am associated to this verse out of Isaiah saying I am ‘he from the wilderness to make straight the path to Jesus’s ministry.’ This understanding means we can’t look around for everyone other than the people around you for a prophet figurehead, rather that it takes time and effort and without these lyrical inklings, the call may never have been further developed. Let’s take a quick look at Matthew 17 verses 10 through 13. ‘And the disciples asked him, “Then why do the scribes say that first Elijah must come?” He answered, “Elijah does come, and he will restore all things. But I tell you that Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him, but did to him whatever they pleased. So also the Son of Man will certainly suffer at their hands.” Then the disciples understood that he was speaking to them of John the Baptist.’
New information isn’t always safe information and an inclination is to cut off the material from unnecessary speculation or scrutiny. Rather in the chapter 17 verse, also talking about the Elijah coming, (the transformation vision on the mountain), that largely up to this point by bible scholars has been an easier conversation to just say the transformation is ‘contributable’ to the two historic past present day examples of Revelation witnesses of the bible (Moses and Elijah were in a vision on the mountain) and leave it at that, as something not to be further addressed. Matthew 11:13-15 highlights this even more directly, ‘For all the Prophets and the Law prophesied until John, and if you are willing to accept it, he is Elijah who is to come. He who has ears to hear, let him hear.’ When we are to avoid irreverent babble, off speculation or contrary false knowledge, sometimes the word creates obstacle even between brethren due to discernment teaching objectives and approaches. This type of understanding is part of a faith that requires moving through some unknowns. The scribes of the past had to go into further conversation on this coming Messiah who was in the genealogy of David and overlook certain common words to see an additional component into the utilization of the words Father, son, and Lord (the pharisee’s on the other hand, bypass synergistic problem solving desire – Matthew 22:41-46) and learn how to explain prophetic ink. They, through belief, had an Elijah return knowing that didn’t quite make sense upon study, yet these prophets and scribes of the past knew spiritual interpretations of how the story could and should go given the already pre-established writings before them.
I saw it unfruitful to have different bible translations growing up, that we shouldn’t need anything but a same copy no extra background debate knowledge (shouldn’t prolong life and not address prophetic recurrence), but I understand that to further engage and to give credit to the hard-earned efforts of translators, there is fruit to make it more readable and approachable to common proper living. Though to forsake this component of the prophetic call can ruin the belief in some people that would then say, ‘I therefore choose my definitions of love and life and choose to go no further but entitled disbelief’ says one with less the congregation mentality (embracing gentile instruction & work friend relationship) that connects and demands the biblical past events to be highlighted and active more than just history examples on goodness teachings in the now.
Part of my Matthew Levi effort with this all, is to set the tone for the Revelation witness mindset, how attaining to it requires a forwardness and steward responsibility (ongoing fervent prayer for now and future and always with faith & immediateness) all the while defending the themes and material within, imitating Paul as good as possible. Are there any additional meanings or suggestions associated to the disciple Matthew? Who is Levi? Is there anything extra to do with reference of the word Levite to this all? The information regarding and provided by Matthew as one of the 12 disciples is somewhat limited, but what we do know doesn’t shy us away from monetary collection exploration in a prophetic recycle of initiative. First off this disciple is referred to as Matthew in the book of Matthew, and Levi in the books of Mark and Luke as a person who decided to start following Jesus on his quest while first sitting at a tax booth. Then, he went on to throw a great feast and gathering for Jesus where many tax collectors and quote on quote ‘sinners,’ resided. See the passages below before we show a couple examples of this word Levite that I believe to be prophetically connected to this Matthew Levi character analogy of the future that begins the blending of a coalition deal collection funding effort with the man of lawlessness always a decision away.
|
|
|
Might I remind you again, part of this proposition prophecy test effort, is to properly reveal ‘the man of lawlessness,’ who’s written of in Daniel ‘as one who runs off with the gods and treasures of Egypt,’ and one who ‘proclaims himself over God and other gods of the earth,’ with some sort of entitlement to do so. If his party can take hosting privilege from holy covenant efforts, can make it a dedicated effort to trample upon gospel knowledge, to proactively not allow a sanctuary to be in its rightful modern place, being day in and day out on a mission to ‘shatter the power of the holy people,’ then there is some connection of this prophetic foretelling to a common modern day collection effort being done through an honest modern day Levitical effort reemergence. Part of the Revelation witness effort is to shut the skies in Egypt as the starting point. It blends a resolve into the equation, that believers aren’t contrarily wanting a form of destruction worse living to occur on behalf of an angry mercy seeking wrath filled God. There is, to some degree with this, an accommodating resolve completely backed by passages in the bible in every which way, that lead to this decision; being fully aware of the threat of prophetic foretelling’s (often disdained by majorities of people) this lightens the prayer effort for drought which to some could almost be construed as a desire for ‘repaying an evil for evil’ being done in contrary fashion to biblical statute and thus something an opponent could strive against, yet shared interpretation out of Zechariah allows Egypt to be part of a decision where highlighted and accessible money helps ease the material (not to mention modern technology and information and pre-established climate awareness). Anyway, back to the limited information we have regarding Matthew and Levi / Levites…
Study task, use a highlighter (or print and underline) all details about the Levites out of 2 Chronicles Chapter 34: 8-32.
2 Chronicles Chapter 35: 20-27 (diplomatic prophetic strategy)
2 Chronicles Chapter 36: 17-21 (false prophecy coalition)
Now regarding Levi and prophecy test, lets continue finalizing this Elijah knowing that Jesus doesn't shy away from - especially at the end of the book of John. To conclude, what is it that I am getting at about action and prophetic interpretation through this all? Who is Elijah alive from the grave, who is John the Baptist, what does that mean or imply? Why did they ask, ‘is this the prophet?’ How does this relate to the disciple whom ‘Jesus loved’ at the end of John? Why did they wonder if he wouldn’t die, yet Jesus didn’t confirm that this disciple would not die but said ‘If it is my will that he remain until I come, what is that to you?’
Trial and error is part of a grace we live out, not all refrain in sacrifice to the same extent; yes teaching with a forward teaching that says ‘see and attain to be anointed’ isn’t always sound given execution, interpretation, and obtaining and the processing of a large amount of connected material, objectives, and teachings throughout our lives. Whether in our youth development years, or former ignorance segments in our lives (especially disbelief as a wild vine branch) or the new believer variances of conceit being puffed in the clouds (I’ve thought it all before, maybe better, maybe more dream angelic inspired) there is some soundness to not teach us to attain to prophet of the Lord – especially given we don’t want to create a worse representation of modern day faith, to be yoked to false prophet ‘I am he’s,’ contributing to false prophecy playing out, that would take away from congregation fruit and zeal.
Nevertheless, from the totality of all things part of this faith, we can’t shy away or misaddress the fact that enough coincidences and revealing’s within the word indicate that this effort must be made more of, especially in the right season of time. Jesus said ‘no sign will be given to his own generation,’ except, 'as Jonah was in the belly of the whale for 3 days and nights, so will the son of man be in the heart of the earth before rising.’ Revelations 11 regarding the two witnesses, who have objectives like Elijah did in the past ‘they have the power to shut the sky, that no rain may fall during the days (3.5 years) of their prophesying,’ have actual objectives to carry out. In this age it must become addressed and carried out. Remember the verse from James 4:16-18 regarding Elijah ‘..The prayer of a righteous person has great power as it is working. Elijah was a man with a nature like ours, and he prayed fervently that it might not rain, and for three years and six months it did not rain on the earth. Then he prayed again, and heaven gave rain, and the earth bore its fruit.’ This task directly pertains to the total objective in the modern age in multiple ways.
Revelations, that highlights a recurring time duration as part of an execution objective, phrases 42 months, 1,260 days, 3.5 years, three years and six months, also connects a short duration of ‘3 days and 3 nights’ or in the last book in the bible ‘3.5 days’ to chapter 11 verse 11 (after the witnesses are killed) saying, ‘But after the three and a half days a breath of life from God entered them, and they stood up on their feet, and great fear fell on those who saw them.’ In this case, the objective of the modern era – unlike Jesus’s timeframe when the only sign to all those who didn’t see his miracles or good works was the knowledge of his resurrection from the cross after 3 days and nights – is to highlight the end time signs communicated to us via the future now technology mediums. Yet to stir us to the total belief comprehension regarding the writings from ages ago, there is yet again a 3-and-a-half-day scenario to create a further faith-based inquiry in us. That, in this age, should occur as part of a large collective effort in the modern age of people all in sync with all of what needs to occur.
Study task, use a highlighter (or print and underline) all details about the Levites out of 2 Chronicles Chapter 34: 8-32.
- Are they project managers?
- Do they have association to entertainment, the art of different peoples mastery’s?
- Do they collect money? Do they have association more to taxation?
- What’s the difference of a priest, a Levite and a Levitical priest and the correlations?
- When they found this ‘book of the law,’ more about Moses and spiritual discernment – was reference of the Psalms part of it? (Relevant to spark photo)
- Did they play a part in rebuilding the ‘house of the LORD?’ How so (in all ways)?
- What can a Levite be referred to as (various job titles)?
2 Chronicles Chapter 35: 20-27 (diplomatic prophetic strategy)
- Knowing Josiah did good in the sight of the Lord as king for 31 years, how does this passage define him and king Neco of Egypt? Explain further aware Neco went on his way.
- How is there a prophetic cooperation though this knowledge that connects to drought in Egypt?
- If the outer courts can’t be measured, and the Euphrates is located near this increased practice area of Islam – then will that land be dry too?
2 Chronicles Chapter 36: 17-21 (false prophecy coalition)
- The Chaldeans with pomp and might are spoken of where else in the bible? What kind of enemy are they?
- If you are practicing the Jewish Christianity, you strive to repay evil for good and to see the will complete through true prophecy. Yet the Chaledeans allow life terms to be created through the bible as something they are aware of as prophetic misguides practicing false prophecy. How does, by the end of this designated section out of Chapter 36, it prove true the word of the Lord through the mouth of Jeremiah the prophet that the 70 years decreed would come to pass without a further resistance? Explain the coalition understanding and how this pertains to the prophetic?
Now regarding Levi and prophecy test, lets continue finalizing this Elijah knowing that Jesus doesn't shy away from - especially at the end of the book of John. To conclude, what is it that I am getting at about action and prophetic interpretation through this all? Who is Elijah alive from the grave, who is John the Baptist, what does that mean or imply? Why did they ask, ‘is this the prophet?’ How does this relate to the disciple whom ‘Jesus loved’ at the end of John? Why did they wonder if he wouldn’t die, yet Jesus didn’t confirm that this disciple would not die but said ‘If it is my will that he remain until I come, what is that to you?’
Trial and error is part of a grace we live out, not all refrain in sacrifice to the same extent; yes teaching with a forward teaching that says ‘see and attain to be anointed’ isn’t always sound given execution, interpretation, and obtaining and the processing of a large amount of connected material, objectives, and teachings throughout our lives. Whether in our youth development years, or former ignorance segments in our lives (especially disbelief as a wild vine branch) or the new believer variances of conceit being puffed in the clouds (I’ve thought it all before, maybe better, maybe more dream angelic inspired) there is some soundness to not teach us to attain to prophet of the Lord – especially given we don’t want to create a worse representation of modern day faith, to be yoked to false prophet ‘I am he’s,’ contributing to false prophecy playing out, that would take away from congregation fruit and zeal.
Nevertheless, from the totality of all things part of this faith, we can’t shy away or misaddress the fact that enough coincidences and revealing’s within the word indicate that this effort must be made more of, especially in the right season of time. Jesus said ‘no sign will be given to his own generation,’ except, 'as Jonah was in the belly of the whale for 3 days and nights, so will the son of man be in the heart of the earth before rising.’ Revelations 11 regarding the two witnesses, who have objectives like Elijah did in the past ‘they have the power to shut the sky, that no rain may fall during the days (3.5 years) of their prophesying,’ have actual objectives to carry out. In this age it must become addressed and carried out. Remember the verse from James 4:16-18 regarding Elijah ‘..The prayer of a righteous person has great power as it is working. Elijah was a man with a nature like ours, and he prayed fervently that it might not rain, and for three years and six months it did not rain on the earth. Then he prayed again, and heaven gave rain, and the earth bore its fruit.’ This task directly pertains to the total objective in the modern age in multiple ways.
Revelations, that highlights a recurring time duration as part of an execution objective, phrases 42 months, 1,260 days, 3.5 years, three years and six months, also connects a short duration of ‘3 days and 3 nights’ or in the last book in the bible ‘3.5 days’ to chapter 11 verse 11 (after the witnesses are killed) saying, ‘But after the three and a half days a breath of life from God entered them, and they stood up on their feet, and great fear fell on those who saw them.’ In this case, the objective of the modern era – unlike Jesus’s timeframe when the only sign to all those who didn’t see his miracles or good works was the knowledge of his resurrection from the cross after 3 days and nights – is to highlight the end time signs communicated to us via the future now technology mediums. Yet to stir us to the total belief comprehension regarding the writings from ages ago, there is yet again a 3-and-a-half-day scenario to create a further faith-based inquiry in us. That, in this age, should occur as part of a large collective effort in the modern age of people all in sync with all of what needs to occur.
|
If false prophecy (AoD) allows thwarting, the only come to pass from my mouth is Jesus will return in the test window.
|
|
|
Will it come to pass to get the million in sync with prophetic fulfillment? It depends on the Abomination of Desolation, the effort set up by antichrists to make desolate the call of Christ in the modern age. The knowledge created up to this point however, the symbolic teachings, even through the minds of opponents whereas this antichrist from just reading or getting a summary could dream his future access to a website with billions of dollars associated to it, could be an iota before the end – yet the only thing left is to strive to see everything done with the right balance of literal and symbolic carryout, that should include more people than in the past when waiting on letter and slow travel.
If it was Zerubbabel and Joshua creating a cornerstone and the Olive Tree Analogy Romans Revelation prophecy out of Zechariah, it was also Peter and Paul (or and with the previously prophesied Timothy the servant capable & interchangeable in the analogy learning), so the question we must ask is why did Jesus have to say ‘the one whom I loved’ in addition to the already set forth knowledge that he loved all the disciples – so why say that? To create action in the future. This disciple saw for Jesus; Peter played with Jesus who yet had to say 'get behind me Satan,' and 'Peter I had to pray that Satan may not sift you.' Peter trusted his own authority yet could forget the angelic realm can change immediate intuition discernment. This other disciple may have come to a complete faith trusting Jesus as one faster to accept things like a child, as one treated smaller and least in the equation of the cup, likely to go through various further difficulties of life and obligation. We know this disciple, whom he loved, leaned over at the table and said to Jesus ‘is this the one who will betray you’ (speaking of Judas Iscariot) as the other disciples, quite possibly, didn’t rationalize this to a further extent. Paul created his own entitlement speculation from Philippians 3:5 saying works and consecration matter, and the sons of thunder cup from Matthew 20:20-23 furthered the inquiry regarding additional title - this disciple 'whom Jesus loved,' part of the 12 disciples crew and quite possibly the future return, may have had a scrutinized resume and lacking sins, yet sat capable in the corner as his true right-hand man.
We know that this disciple also ‘ran to the tomb faster than Peter.’ If Peter didn't have spy-chain-authority working over the others in the group with additional non-disclosed communications with Jesus (in that Peter denied three times correctly with forefront knowledge and communication with Jesus prior) not intended for reader awareness, then there is something to quick discernment regarding intuition that relates more with Jesus spending eternal time. Yes its possible that they first documented, for prophetic purposes, the creation of the upfront reaction where Peter first said 'preposterous, I’d die for you! I'd never betray you!' Yet Jesus gave him the look afterwards saying so you want prison for life after they capture you – can you go against my prophetic mouth anyway after I just said this? Peter reacts at those denial moments with the proper awareness upfront, then colluded and handled by the spiritual realm to ensure fulfillment in those moments he carried out fulfillment. Not even preposterous to say he was the leader over the other disciple, as Peter had learned his style and personality with Jesus and his responses. This disciple whom he loved could likely be more aware of the stray 1 sheep and what that entails verse the 99 religious sheep that don’t create as much requirement or quick thinking given they believe cultivated which doesn't give as much credit to why people choose to disbelieve, even against condemnation and hell threats. Around sinners against gospel theme, such as what Levi surrounded himself with, it creates extra reaction requirement so this person literally faster than Peter may have had more of the dynamic people conversationalist inherent gift of no judgement clay mold predestination trust – as Jesus and likely this disciple too, got time with sinners and tax collectors as a role of additional total focus. Who is who in this isn’t the point, yes this disciple could be reference of one of the Revelation witnesses, could be the initiator of the Daniel vision (to even allow an accorded exclusive funding effort to manifest as a Levi reemergence via promissory early withdraw tax pledging), even the one beloved by women (who the man of lawlessness doesn’t listen oblige to), or merely a teaching to initiate the true dedicated Elijah servant of the modern times. Lest the material not be weighted in accordance to the totality of the word!
GETTING A BETTER FEEL FOR PROPHETHOOD
If it was Zerubbabel and Joshua creating a cornerstone and the Olive Tree Analogy Romans Revelation prophecy out of Zechariah, it was also Peter and Paul (or and with the previously prophesied Timothy the servant capable & interchangeable in the analogy learning), so the question we must ask is why did Jesus have to say ‘the one whom I loved’ in addition to the already set forth knowledge that he loved all the disciples – so why say that? To create action in the future. This disciple saw for Jesus; Peter played with Jesus who yet had to say 'get behind me Satan,' and 'Peter I had to pray that Satan may not sift you.' Peter trusted his own authority yet could forget the angelic realm can change immediate intuition discernment. This other disciple may have come to a complete faith trusting Jesus as one faster to accept things like a child, as one treated smaller and least in the equation of the cup, likely to go through various further difficulties of life and obligation. We know this disciple, whom he loved, leaned over at the table and said to Jesus ‘is this the one who will betray you’ (speaking of Judas Iscariot) as the other disciples, quite possibly, didn’t rationalize this to a further extent. Paul created his own entitlement speculation from Philippians 3:5 saying works and consecration matter, and the sons of thunder cup from Matthew 20:20-23 furthered the inquiry regarding additional title - this disciple 'whom Jesus loved,' part of the 12 disciples crew and quite possibly the future return, may have had a scrutinized resume and lacking sins, yet sat capable in the corner as his true right-hand man.
We know that this disciple also ‘ran to the tomb faster than Peter.’ If Peter didn't have spy-chain-authority working over the others in the group with additional non-disclosed communications with Jesus (in that Peter denied three times correctly with forefront knowledge and communication with Jesus prior) not intended for reader awareness, then there is something to quick discernment regarding intuition that relates more with Jesus spending eternal time. Yes its possible that they first documented, for prophetic purposes, the creation of the upfront reaction where Peter first said 'preposterous, I’d die for you! I'd never betray you!' Yet Jesus gave him the look afterwards saying so you want prison for life after they capture you – can you go against my prophetic mouth anyway after I just said this? Peter reacts at those denial moments with the proper awareness upfront, then colluded and handled by the spiritual realm to ensure fulfillment in those moments he carried out fulfillment. Not even preposterous to say he was the leader over the other disciple, as Peter had learned his style and personality with Jesus and his responses. This disciple whom he loved could likely be more aware of the stray 1 sheep and what that entails verse the 99 religious sheep that don’t create as much requirement or quick thinking given they believe cultivated which doesn't give as much credit to why people choose to disbelieve, even against condemnation and hell threats. Around sinners against gospel theme, such as what Levi surrounded himself with, it creates extra reaction requirement so this person literally faster than Peter may have had more of the dynamic people conversationalist inherent gift of no judgement clay mold predestination trust – as Jesus and likely this disciple too, got time with sinners and tax collectors as a role of additional total focus. Who is who in this isn’t the point, yes this disciple could be reference of one of the Revelation witnesses, could be the initiator of the Daniel vision (to even allow an accorded exclusive funding effort to manifest as a Levi reemergence via promissory early withdraw tax pledging), even the one beloved by women (who the man of lawlessness doesn’t listen oblige to), or merely a teaching to initiate the true dedicated Elijah servant of the modern times. Lest the material not be weighted in accordance to the totality of the word!
GETTING A BETTER FEEL FOR PROPHETHOOD
